Talking It Out

   

     I want to talk about my junior final. Tiz, Jeff and I just concluded a short, three-week unit to finish up the semester. We wanted to end the year with an SEL based unit, so we exposed students to literature loosely based on the theme of self-love. Over the course of the last couple of weeks, students read and analyzed various poems and pieces of literature. They practiced annotating and discussing how these types of shorter works are created, so there was heavy emphasis on writer’s craft/literary devices during class lessons.
     I’m really happy with the writing they produced for the final, and I think that one reason the writing is decent is because of the process they were required to work through. Over the course of the last three weeks, students practiced this process several times. That helped. On the day of the final, students were introduced to two brand-new pieces of literature. Together we read through them; they had pencil in hand. Then, students had to quickly choose which piece of literature they were going to work through for their final writing piece. Once students chose which text they liked, they had about 6 minutes to annotate it by themselves. After that, each student had to find a peer, who chose the same piece of literature, and they discussed each other’s annotations/ideas. I think this is such a valuable step in the process; Tiz and I discussed how our best ideas often come from talking it out. After their talking time, they wrote. Once all the prewriting steps were completed, students had about an hour to write for the final.
      I’m now grading these writing pieces, and they’re not bad. Students are talking about the tone of literature and how that tone was created. I’ve found that students were mostly successful in articulating these in a clear and concise fashion. I’m happy. Really, I feel like I won just getting 16/17 year olds to write for an hour, not on SnapChat.

Surrounded by Experts

Sometimes our school focus on collaboration has felt like an added pressure, a box to check or a goal to complete. When asked to be intentional about collaboration and include it in my goals, I have sometimes felt that I am trying to force something to happen. Who will I collaborate with within my department? What about across departments? How do our subjects align or complement each other? How can we help students make connections?

    At the beginning of this year I created goals to help me collaborate effectively. My most collaboration-centric goal focused on my teaching of the Frosh Wellness: Mind, Body, Spirit course, which requires intense, daily work between religious studies and kinesiology. While I have been focusing a great deal on effective collaboration for the Frosh Wellness course, I have also found myself collaborating in surprising ways. 

    This year I have taken advantage of the fact that I am surrounded by experts in their fields. For those who may not know, this is my 8th year at Carondelet, but my first year full time teaching. As you can imagine, this new role has brought about new challenges and opportunities. I teach 3 sections of the junior religious studies course, Symbols & Ethics. The two central focuses of this course are Sacraments and social ethics. The students learn about the 7 sacraments, as well as topics such as sustainability and the environment, abortion, poverty, hunger, immigration, racism, the criminal justice system, sexism and a variety of other topics that impact our world today. My background is in theology and yet I find myself touching on climate (the environment), art (sacraments & spirituality), biology (abortion), economics (poverty & hunger), globalization & politics (immigration) and the list goes on and on. With every social/ ethical topic that we cover we look at 

Sacred Scripture – What does the Bible have to say about this topic?
  1. Sacred Tradition – What does the Catholic Church have to say about this topic?
  2. Logic/ Science/ Reason – What can we learn about this topic from experts and from the world around us?
  3. Personal Experience – What experiences have you had that impact your understanding of this topic? (Example: Your race may impact how you understand racism)
  4. When teaching #3 – What science and experts in the field can teach us about a particular topic – I have found myself seeking out colleagues for help. When I taught about our responsibility to care for all of God’s creation, I sought Susan Domanico and Michelle Koshi for help. I had the students research environmental concerns and write advocacy letters to people in positions of power (politicians, CEOs of companies, etc). Susan helped me come up with a list of potential environmental concerns and gave me an extensive list of resources. Similarly, Michelle, connected me with a number of online resources based on the different topics that students would be researching. Susan’s knowledge of environmental science and Michelle’s competency in library science empowered me to teach with greater confidence and depth. 

    When I taught the Sacrament of baptism, I wanted to incorporate religious art to highlight the important symbols and theological themes of baptism. I reached out to Andrew Kjera and he was able to come into my class to share a guest-lecture on symbolism within religious art. The students were then invited to create a piece of art using Sketchbook (an app that I was not familiar with, but that Andrew recommended), to express their personal connection to the themes of baptism through symbols. The outcome was tremendous! See a few examples below…

    When teaching about Hunger, students watched a documentary called “A Place at the Table,” which tells the story of hunger in the United States. The documentary touched on US agricultural policies and farm subsidies. Knowing very little about this topic, I sought out Mitch for conversation. Our short conversation in room 26 during break helped prepare me to tackle this topic in class. Similarly, when teaching about poverty, I wanted to touch on income inequality, and taxes. I went to Christina Leveque who teaches Financial Algebra with my questions and after a brief conversation felt ready to include these topics in my lesson. 

    I have brainstormed best practices to help students think critically about assigned reading with Michael Schooler. Phil Miller and I have talked about the history of labor unions in the United States (my class studied labor unions as part of our unit on the Dignity of Work)… and the list goes on and on. 

    If you are like me, you may feel slightly intimidated by the culture of collaboration at Carondelet. However, I have began to overcome my apprehension to collaborate by recognizing the great resource that my colleagues are to me. Collaboration is not a forced goal to achieve, but instead begins with an acceptance of the gift of my colleagues – experts in their field, thoughtful and eager to share what they know. Any time I have asked colleagues about their area of expertise I am always humbled by their willingness to share their knowledge and time. They are excited about their subject and have such great insights and ideas. I have truly learned so much from these mini collaborations that have taken place this year and will continue to seek out the expertise of my colleagues in the future. 

    I’m wondering – what kind of mini collaborations have taken place for others this year? Who has helped you understand a topic with greater depth or brought expertise to your curriculum that has enriched your classroom? 

Math Program version 2.0

Last year was an exciting and exhausting year for the math department.  We implemented a huge change to how we teach Algebra and it resulted in moments of happiness and frustration.  While we are extremely proud of the first version of the program, we always knew it was only the first iteration.  We knew we would go back and reflect on what worked and add modifications for the next version.

On Wednesday we had the opportunity to share out about our program to faculty and staff who wanted to learn more.  It was wonderful to see almost every department represented and many staff members as well.  Here is a link to the presentation we shared if you were unable to attend our session but would like to learn more. 

We initially started out with 3 goals for our program: 

  • de-track students
  • increase student agency
  • encourage collaboration and communication
Our program overall was successful in implementing these goals and we are continually refining what we’ve created.  We’ve created more opportunities for break out direct instruction every week.  We are tracking students’ progress more than ever through exit tickets, goal setting meetings, check ins with their lead teacher, and attendance at Math Power Hour.  In addition we’ve modified our Algebra Challenge Exam for incoming freshmen to make it mastery based.  Freshmen also had the opportunity to come in over the summer and get a head start on the Algebra curriculum and over 50 took advantage of this.  As a result we have over half of the freshmen already into the Algebra curriculum which will increase the likelihood of them beginning Geometry this year or give them the opportunity to slow down and focus on depth if needed.  
There are a lot of misconceptions about our program and I think they can be summarized here.  
It was wonderful to have the opportunity to share out with our community something we are really proud of and I hope other departments will do the same.  I would love to have the chance to learn more in depth about some of our other classes and programs.  

That One Time I Had An Idea…

I have so many ideas that I don’t even know what to do with them. Finding the time and energy for all of the things swirling through my head is a daunting task. Once I have an idea, and I think it’s great, I automatically think about how I can make it better…and then I get overwhelmed and it becomes a vicious cycle. 
I actually had so many ideas for blog posts, and they all live in my head and I haven’t found the time until now (because I have to) to actually compose my ideas in this blog…woops?
Anyway. My most recent idea came from Lacy Matthews: 
She’s the best! 🙂

who made an announcement about immigration over the loud speaker one morning during prayer in first period. I got inspired in that instant to assign my Spanish 3 Honors students the task of writing a personal narrative of an immigrant coming from a Spanish speaking country during this time. Students were to write their story in the first person from the perspective of an immigrant (obviously in Spanish).  First they were required to pick a scenario: which country? What is this person like? What is their family like? What challenges or successes arose from the immigration process?

Students researched social media posts, news articles, blogs, vlogs, pretty much anything available to them to get the most accurate, authentic perspective they could find. And they really enjoyed it. They were tasked to work in groups, and produce a dramatic, first person perspective narrative of what an immigrant might go through in various scenarios.
My students found themselves learning about government policies regarding immigration, polarizing perspectives, the daily struggles of someone living in a war-torn country or a country with limited economic opportunities. They found themselves feeling compassionate toward individuals that they had never encountered before. They learned things that weren’t readily available in a textbook or a lecture, and that’s awesome.  Oh, and I guess they learned some Spanish along the way too 😉
I found that my students were really into this project. They took pride in what they were doing,  and they wanted to do it well. They were meticulous with the grammar, conjugations, subject verb agreement, adjectives, and the best word choice, because as one student put it: “I want to do these people justice. Their story is important, and I owe it to them to do a good job.” 
(And then my teacher heart exploded into a million happy pieces!) 
I later found out from one of my students who has Lacy for religion class that she was simultaneously teaching about immigration and was showing a film titled: “Which Way Home?’ (I think that’s what the movie was called, my brain turned to mush during Christmas break, correct me if I’m wrong, Lacy). Students in her class were also privileged to see a guest speaker who discussed immigration policy and bills regarding the issue. I was delighted to know that several of my students in my Spanish class also share Lacy’s class and we were discussing the same themes.
This unintentional collaboration happens more often than not with my classes. Somehow whatever I happen to be teaching completely coincides with another discipline, and then BAM! Interdisciplinary teaching. The only problem is, I don’t want to have to find out from my students what’s happening in other classes, but it’s a welcome blessing anyway. I love to see that my students are making the connections on their own without it being forced. I like when learning is organic, and when students can come to their own conclusions on their own. 
Back to what I was saying about so many ideas…I like this project…It has been great so far, but I want to do MORE with it. I’m open to more ideas and suggestions because I want to expand on this topic. I don’t want to just leave it as an essay. Let me know your thoughts! 

A Writing Class Disguised as a Podcasting Class

In the first few weeks of each of my English classes, I always open up a real-talk discussion about writing. I start by acknowledging that writing is one of the most challenging tasks that students are asked to do in school, which usually elicits vigorous nods throughout the room. Writing is nuanced and abstract, and requires students to consider ideas, structure, evidence, arguments and precision all within the great messiness of language and syntax. Many students lack confidence in their writing abilities, and their approach to writing assignments often consists of suffering through the process, like a trip to the dentist, with the assurance that it will be over eventually.
While I am aware of the challenges my students face, time constraints often reduce my instruction of the writing process to a series of steps: brainstorm, research, thesis, outline, draft, revisions, final draft (with consideration for audience, voice and tone thrown in if time allows). Sometimes I fly through all of these concepts in a matter of days, hoping that something will stick to each student. Sometimes I have my students turn in each part of the writing process for points, hoping that this will inspire some sort of epiphany, like “Mr. Schooler, some really unexpected ideas came up in my mind map that I never would have seen if you hadn’t reviewed the process of circling ideas and drawing lines between those bubbles!” At the end of this rushed process, the essay is turned in and I boomerang it back to each student within two weeks with a grade on top and feedback that is skimmed and tossed away.
 
But the writing process is so much more sacred than what I often reduce it to. In its highest form this process can produce clarity from abstractions, allow for discovery of new insights and can actually transform one’s understanding of themselves and the world around them. Writing is often a big messy struggle that can teach lessons of resilience and perseverance that transfer to so many aspects of life. My approach to many projects in life mirrors my own writing process, whether it’s building a chicken coop, cooking a holiday meal or redesigning my back yard.
Two years ago, I attended the CCCC (Conference on College Composition and Communication), and one session that stood out to me was given by a professor who shared his experiences teaching a podcast project in his class. At first this seemed somewhat out of place for a conference that focused mostly on writing instruction, but I started to wonder whether a podcast wasn’t just another form of writing. A podcast producer must work with ideas, organization, evidence, tone and word choice all while considering the audience at the other end of their work. This idea stuck with me for a while, germinating, until I decided to create a Podcasting and Storytelling class.
When I started telling people I was teaching a podcasting class, they often asked me about recording. As someone whose recording experience is limited to making mix tapes and CD’s in college, I started to wonder whether or not I was in over my head. In fact, my knowledge with podcasts is pretty limited too – I have spent hours listening to them running the trails of Mount Diablo, but I have never tried to make one.
But I took solace in the fact that I do know quite a bit about the writing process, and that this class is really just a writing class disguised as a podcasting class. And, while in the first few weeks, many of my students thought that it would just be a chill, blended class where they would listen to interesting podcasts, I knew what the class would turn into, and I was thrilled that I had successfully duped them into an extensive writing project.
After an introductory unit in which we deconstructed the art of storytelling, my students formed teams that would work towards the long-term goal of producing a podcast. The first phase of the project was to identify a topic that everyone was interested in and research all they could about that topic. Each team member was responsible for documenting their research, and writing reflections on how it would direct the team’s project. One of my teams started out by wanting to do a podcast on the Byron Hot Springs, an abandoned building in Byron that teenagers sneak into since it is supposedly haunted. Over the next few weeks, this team went into a full deep dive, learning all they could about this location. They discovered that it had originated as a train depot, then became a luxury hotel that stars like Marilyn Monroe visited, then served as a satellite Japanese internment camp, then burned down twice mysteriously and now stands as just a shell of a building. One student read about how Charlie Chaplin used to visit the hotel and she decided to watch one of his films. This team even found the owner’s name and the current value of the property on Zillow. I like to think that this team got much more out of this research experience than simply searching for usable quotes from the internet, which is what many of my students do when I assign research papers.
As we shifted from the research to the production phase of the project, each team had to brainstorm and determine a central idea for their podcast. They had to give a quick two-minute pitch to the rest of the class, then receive feedback on their ideas before writing a formal proposal. As we have now shifted to the production phase, the goal is to create original content that can be used in the final cut. This involves writing scripts and monologues, conducting interviews, and considering the best organizational structure to tell their specific story. This has turned out to be a spontaneous process full of dead ends, revisions, regrouping and improvisation. But the attention that these students are putting into their work is greater than the attention my students usually put into a rushed essay process. Most of our class sessions are collaborative workshops, and I bounce from team to team listening to them discuss various rhetorical choices, like word choice, structure, tone, audience and voice. Instead of me flying through these skills that I have always tried to instill, these students are implementing these skills within the context of their projects. They have determined that these are the important qualities of their writing that they need to consider.
My ultimate goal for this class is to create a Carondelet podcast channel that gets thousands of subscribers, and becomes something our school is known for. But I still have no idea what these final projects will be, and I expect that some will be better than others. This class has made me consider which is more valuable for my students, the process or the final product, but that’s a subject for another blog. One of the great things about teaching a semester class is that it allows me to make my own revisions, and I don’t have to wait a whole year to do things better. And while I still think it is important that students write essays in school, it has been invigorating to reimagine the different forms essays can take. 

More Writing, Less Grading—it’s true!

            I want
students to write more, but I want to grade less. It just so happens I found an
avenue to make this happen.
            For five
weeks in a row, I’ve had my sophomores spend the first half of block writing
about a selected passage from Jane Eyre.
During the second half of block, they use a single-point rubric to peer edit in
a round-robin fashion.
            After that,
each student decides which essay she would want to turn in for a grade. I
collect the “keepers” but I don’t grade them. The next week, after another
timed write and round of peer editing, I pass the keepers back out. Once again,
students choose between the essay they wrote today and the keeper from last
week. I collect the keepers again, and so on. It reminds me of being at the eye
doctor: “Which one is better? 1 or 2? Better here … or here?”
            Today is
the last week, and at the end of the day, I will have a stack of keepers to
grade. They will have written five in-class essays and I only have to grade
one.
            Here are some
of the benefits:
  • Students do not receive a letter
    grade until the final one, so they have to look beyond “the bottom line” and
    actually think about how they are doing
  • Students engage regularly with
    the rubric to better understand how to write well
  • Students learn to rely on their
    peers for feedback instead of seeing the teacher as the only expert in the room
  • Students rely on their instincts
    and self-evaluative skills—they take ownership of their writing
  • Each week is another opportunity
    to out-do the last keeper, so students are motivated to do their best each time
    (you should see them scribbling away!)
  • If a student misses class or has
    a bad day, she knows she will have four other opportunities, so it takes the
    stress level down
  • In-class, handwritten writing reduces
    cheating
  • It’s great for formative assessment:
    I can quickly read through the stack of keepers and intervene individually for
    comprehension gaps or writing skill gaps
  • Students are compelled to
    consider key passages from Jane Eyre
    that they may have glossed over in their reading
  • Students have choice in which of
    their essays receives a grade
  • Students practice a type of
    passage study they will see on the SAT and AP tests
  • Increased writing volume and frequency
  • Students receive instant feedback
    on the same day from their peers
  • Students get to see how 2-3 other
    students approached the same passage and prompt
  • Peer editing happens while the
    writing itself is fresh in their minds
  • Students talk to each other about
    their approaches while they do their round-robin peer editing

            I’m so
excited about how well this works and hope to adapt it going forward.  

Statistics: Vehicle for Interdisciplinary Study and Service

I love teaching AP Statistics.  What I love even more is doing Statistics.  When we came to the end of the first (of four) units in this course, Descriptive Statistics, I was looking for a way to let my students practice the Statistics we had learned.  Last year we created and administered a silly little survey about how the start of school was going for Carondelet and DLS students.  This survey certainly served it’s purpose and added an element of fun. 

This year, I wanted to do something different.  Having been a pretty bad member of the Sr. Clare Dunn Forum planning committee (I think I’ve missed every meeting this year) I thought there might be a way for me to make up for that, and a way to connect my students to this school-wide event.  I reached out to Kristy Schow with my idea and asked her what would be useful to know about our school community ahead of the forum.  Here’s her response:

1. Why does the criminal justice system need reform? Does it need reform? In what ways?
2. Is meaningful reform possible in our political/economic/social climate? Why/why not? What type of reform is most meaningful/beneficial?
3. Are there alternatives to prison? What are they? When are they appropriate?
4. What are the social impacts of imprisonment and the economic impacts?
5. What injustices do we see in our prison system and our criminal justice system? What is the solution?

While these questions were great, they were too broad and open-ended to put on a survey.  And what I love about this is that this is exactly what happens with real research every day.  A researcher (Kristy) wants to know information about a group of people and it’s the job of the Statistician (my students) to flesh out the needed information and operationalize them into concrete variables with categories or numerical responses.  In one 45 minute period I divided my class into five groups and gave each group one of the questions above.  Their job was to turn the one broad question into 3-4 survey questions.  At the same time, they had to think of any important demographic/background variables needed on our survey.  Here‘s what they came up with. 

We posted the survey to Schoology and within a week had over 500 responses!  They spent the next 2-3 weeks analyzing the results, using Minitab Statistical software, and building a report and poster to summarize their findings. 

Today we hung our posters in the inner-court, contributing to the impressive museum that the planning committee has created. 

We hope you can visit and see what our community thinks about prison reform and how these beliefs trend based on gender, political views and other demographics.

Today was a win for me.  Allowing my students to see that Statistics is a math tool with far reaching potential (most people don’t see Math and Social Studies as a natural pairing) is an important lesson.  I hope it might pique some of their career interests and help them see the flexibility, and the power, of Math.  I also love that there was a service component to this project.  While we could have come up with our own topic on which to survey students, it was much more rich to act as consultants, work with Kristy’s broad themes and create a survey that actually served others.  This was a great example of school work being the total opposite of busy work.  The work they created, in a class, served to educate our community on an important, relevant and timely topic.

What other ways can we create school-wide events where we as teachers can create projects that allow us to collaborate and serve the school?

Big Voices Dread to Joy

I have to admit that I started this year with a sense of dread. How was I going to execute brand new curriculum in a class I haven’t taught in twenty years, differentiate for students who desire honors designation, while collaborating with history teachers who were also implementing brand new curriculum in their frosh classes? I thought, this is crazy and I will need some therapy to get through it. I love being wrong.

Well, I wasn’t completely wrong. The class has its challenges, like juggling grammar, literary terms, and Membean vocabulary; honors, regular and core texts; three separate yet concurrent writing assignments; and presentations to top it all off. Behind the scenes, I’m a controller of chaos. In the classroom, all the students see is a well-oiled machine. How do I do it? I don’t. WE do.

Working with my cohorts, Lisa and Kate, is the reason this works. We meet every third period, pounding out the gritty details of the big picture of Big Voices we planned over the summer. Three minds have created a year of English for these girls far richer than anything I could have done on my own. If not for Lisa, I never would have thought to have freshmen writing a research-based synthesis essay on myths that the girls chose to explore. If not for Kate, I never would have thought to have my students write “Where I’m From” poems that they enthusiastically shared with their peers. And, the icing on the cake is that these assignments parallel so well with the origin stories that my history cohort, Miranda, is teaching in Big History.

Speaking of Big History, I didn’t think we’d be on the same page until second semester with the Little Big History Project. For that endeavor, the collaboration seems like a no-brainer, and we’re looking forward to it. Until then, we are matching our units up thematically. It seemed like the best we could do until Miranda, Joanie, and Gaeby recognized that the basic skills we were teaching should unite us as well. For example, we make sure to use the same vocabulary and format when teaching text annotations and we’ll do the same with our many of our writing assignments. I love to see the students nodding their heads when I say, “You’re doing the same thing in Big History, right?”

In addition to the rich content, the sharing of students, and the support we give each other, this collaboration effort is fun. Whether we’re meeting in our small dept. groups or gathering as a larger, cross-curricular group, we enjoy each other and work well together. I’m not sure what the future holds for Big History and Big Voices as more collaboration opportunities with additional subject areas present themselves, but my initial dread has transformed to joy.

Reentry Is Rough

Reentry is rough friends. This is my mantra for the first weeks of school.

1) I think I have such a tricky time with reentry in part because of the artificial lighting in my classroom. All of my classes are in room 21, which I love, but there is no natural light in that room, so it takes me a minute to adjust to the lack of sunlight.

 
This is a picture of my kitchen, my work area at home. Do you see all of the natural light? After spending the majority of summer break at home, spending days without natural light at school takes time to get used to.

2) The second reason reentry is rough is because I always start off feeling less than; I might need to get off Twitter. One day during the first week of school this is what I was met with via Twitter:

The fabulous Carol Jago tragically says, “Students feel unseen, anonymous, until the teacher learns their names.” No pressure, right? Look at the young woman (3rd comment) who brags that she knows all of her students’ names by day 2. Day 2! Well, right there I feel like a failure. Is the self-worth of my students determined by my ability to have a functioning short-term memory? Geez, I hope not.
3) Finally, this year reentry is particularly rough because I’m teaching juniors in English 3 for the first time in seven years and I’m alone. I am creating and planning curriculum for English 3 without a buddy, and I am out of my comfort zone. I’m used to collaborating. In my soul I am a people person, so planning this class has been a little scary and lonely.
I can see the light though. Or, I’m literally getting used to the light, and I mostly know all of the kids’ names. Plus, I’ve got a plan with juniors: keep them writing and engaged. And, I’m happy to report that I’m already sort of killing it with this group.

I just keep telling myself that I’ve got this. But, I’m not going to lie. Reentry is rough!

The Fibonacci Sequence = Math + Religion

An Introduction to the Beauty of the Fibonacci Sequence

Recently we’ve been talking a lot about cross-curricular projects and classes: math + science, English + history, religion + history, etc.  What about math and religion?  Where is the intersection?

Last year, a colleague shared a video with me called “The Fingerprint of God”.  In the video the narrator shows many examples of the Fibonacci Sequence (and spiral) in nature, including spirals in nautilus shells matching the spiral curve of a wave matching the spiral curve of our galaxy, and comments that this spiral is like a fingerprint of a common creator.  It blew my mind when I first watched it.  God does math?  Math came from God?  How does this all work?

The Fingerprint of God Video

I desperately wanted my students to have that same enlightening moment so I tried to design a project/activity that would allow them to have that experience.  I asked Adam Chaffey to help me and together we planned our Fingerprint of God activity which spanned the Monday and Tuesday before Thanksgiving break.  The girls were definitely confused when I told them we would be doing a religion + math hybrid activity, but getting to “break the silos” and show them that math and religion can work together was exciting.  On the first day, I showed the girls the Fibonacci Sequence (my students had already “discovered” this earlier in the year) and some examples of the sequence and spiral in nature before sending them out to find examples of their own.  On the second day, Adam showed the Fingerprint of God video and we discussed how seeing this “fingerprint” affected our faith.  Finally, the students were tasked to create a song/video tying together all that we had talked about over the last two days.  (I’ve attached a couple below)


Things I have to figure out how to improve for next time: 

  1. Make it a more discovery-based project instead of a discussion-based project.  I think I was so excited about sharing this with the students that I front-loaded this activity too much.  The discussions were good, but it felt anti-climatic.  There didn’t seem to be any “ah-ha!” moments.  The students did everything we asked of them, but didn’t really figure anything out on their own.  How can I guide them without giving them too much?
  2. Figure out how to collaborate with another class/teacher more smoothly.  I know this was made more difficult by the fact that I have the same group of students 1st and 2nd period, but the logistics of collaborating with a two religion classes was a real challenge.  Adam and I both had girls that were in both of our classes in different periods and therefore ended up hearing the same information and doing the same activity multiple times–not ideal.

…any ideas?

Student Submissions:

…thanks for your help Adam!