Sometimes Things Go Better Than I Had Planned…

My Spanish 3 Honors students can conjugate 21 tenses in any given form on command. They can analyze and discuss the similarities and differences between Jorge Luis Borges’ short story and Salvador Dali’s surrealist paintings through the theme of duality of being and metafiction. My Spanish 3 Honors students can discuss the benefits and moral disadvantages of stem-cell research and technology in the medical field. They can recite the Beatitudes, discuss genocide in Guatemala, all in Spanish…HOWEVER: 
Many of them do it in an inauthentic accent that makes me weep bitterly at night…(okay that’s not true, but the accents definitely need some work…)
I have struggled for YEARS to find techniques to keep my brilliant students accountable for having an authentic accent. Their accent must match their genius minds. When I correct them in class, and they repeat after me, they are able to sound authentic and within a few minutes, they revert back to overcompensating with an “Americanized” accent (Imagine Dr. Phil speaking Spanish…)
You’re welcome.
While I understand that speaking Spanish with an authentic accent isn’t imperative to understanding the general gist of what a person is saying, and I also recognize and appreciate the fact that not everyone is capable of sounding like they jumped out of a Spanish telenovela, I do find it to be important to at least make an attempt to the best of one’s ability to produce a sound that is as similar as possible to the target language (in this case, Spanish). To make this blog not such a long read, I’ll get to the point…

I wanted to find a fun, out of the box tool that would help my Honors students become cognizant of their accents and to hold them accountable for trying to sound as authentic as possible. I wanted to provide them with a tool that they could use to practice at home. I introduce you to:
It’s a game where people try to pronounce certain words with a plastic barrier in their mouths. (Apparently it’s hilarious, I’ve never played…) Anyway, I came up with this idea because many English vowels require the speaker to close their mouths to pronounce. For example: “oh” or “u” (you). If you just tried saying these vowels, you find that your lips close together. My students are saying words like “dos” and “ocho” like “dose” and “ohchoh”. In Spanish, the mouth stays open. It’s hard to explain in writing, but the plastic tool prevents students from closing their mouths, thus forcing them to pronounce the vowels in a more authentic way. Here are some videos, first in English, then Spanish:

I asked my students what they thought about this new technique to help them with their accents, some said that they liked it and they could feel that the plastic piece was helping them be aware of the positioning of their lips when they spoke. Others said that it didn’t really help. Perhaps they won’t go home and practice with their own tools that I provided to them, but there was an even more valuable lesson that came up with using this ridiculous piece of plastic. It was ridiculous. I have found over the years that in order to be successful at speaking a language, one must take risks. The mental filter that tells you that you sound dumb, or are going to sound ridiculous impedes many language learners from actually attempting to speak. The biggest lesson for my students was to eliminate the filter, to both look and feel ridiculous, and attempt to speak anyway. Did this piece of plastic help them improve their accents dramatically? Perhaps not, but it certainly made them more cognizant of their accent, and it was a physical reminder to let go of the filter and just try to sound the best that they can. This is not what I had planned to happen with this activity. I was more focused on getting my students to sound more authentic, but an even better result came from the class: My students were having fun, they lost their obtrusive filters, and began to let go of the fear of speaking (and singing). 

I’d say that’s a win!

Ted Talk that is listed as top ten for educators

Elizabeth recommending a Ted Talk?  I can see you smirking through my screen 😉
But I love them so and so want to share !!! (oh, FYI I did watch the Susan Cain “Quiet” Ted Talk brought up during the interactive session at back to school planning days)…

Ok so today, I wanted to share a really short and simple Ted Talk.  7 minutes long (4.25 if you use my play it faster life hack), this 2013 talk was cried it in not one but TWO sessions when I went to ISTE.  I had never heard it — yes I know…

The premise is so very simple and her advice resonates deeply as I spend my evenings at Carondelet making schedule changes and answering parent emails about schedule changes and must-haves.

I think her message will speak to all of us at Carondelet… her message is one of the reasons we have all joined to be with kindred spirits on this crazy innovation journey… but we have  all encountered the type of teacher she describes at some point in our career.

The fact is, teaching is not about being best friends with your students, but it is about making human connections.  She explores this concept in a very passionate way.  It is a nice reminder of our shared humanity and, I believe, a great Ted twist on our yearly theme of unifying love!

Hope you enjoy it… hope it reinforces your love for that kid who has mastered the snotty eye roll 😉

The Global Education Leadership Conference: Lessons, Questions & Reflections

Elizabeth Chaponot and I just returned from the Global Education Leadership Conference in D.C. As a 2014 Teachers for Global Classrooms alum, I was invited to attend the conference with an administrator by the sponsoring partners, IREX and the U.S. Department of State. I presented an identity-anchored framework for teaching literature and Elizabeth presented on empowering teacher leadership.

The focus of the conference was teacher leadership and global education. “Connect. Innovate. Lead” was the theme. It was exciting and inspiring to connect with teachers from around the country. While they are fresh in my mind, I wanted to share some takeaways:

(1) What exactly is global education? As we develop our curriculum and programming moving forward, we must deliberately work toward cultivating a global perspective in our students. Nurturing global citizens ties in with so much of what we are already talking about — the habits of mind, CSJ mission, social justice education, design think, etc. Making sure our students have a global mindset moving forward means that our students are constantly doing the following:

  • investigating the world
  • weighing perspectives
  • communicating ideas for diverse audiences
  • taking action
  • applying disciplinary and interdisciplinary knowledge
(2)  What is my personal global education vision? My dream is for our students to connect with each other and their local and global communities through ideas, books, and writing. I can’t wait to explore how our students might participate in The Global Read Aloud and connect with the students of other teachers I connected with at the conference.
(3) Adding a “take action” portion to units now feels more manageable. Sara Krakauer, author the Innovation on Earth blog shared a framework for student-centered activist projects that I plan on using with my sophomores and seniors next semester as they research a woman’s issue that they care about. She also broke down activism into five useful categories: direct service, advocacy, organizing, awareness/education, fundraising.
(4) What does it mean to be a good leader/teacher? Some of the best speakers I heard, including the U.S. Teacher of the Year Sydnee Chaffee, shared a vision for leadership that really resonated with me. Good leaders are humble. They listen and empower others. Leadership isn’t about trying to get people to change or to see things your way. It’s about putting values first and creating a space that empowers others and encourages them to grow.
(5) My big questions… What does it mean to provide a global education for young women in particular? How should we be leading our students, as young women, to be global citizens? How can we better partner with our C.S.J. sister schools? 
(6) I want to go IB! I’m convinced that the International Baccalaureatte Programme (1) is way better than A.P. classes, (2) provides a cohesive “big idea”-centered and rigorous curriculum that truly cultivates a global mindset, and (3) is a program we should seriously consider moving forward. It has already packaged so much of what we are trying to do and seems to offer exceptional professional development. We would instantly be tied in with an established network of schools around the world. 

I Can and I Will — Why Carondelet Needs to Lead the Way

As we grapple with this big Wicked problem that is education, sometimes may wonder why WE have to lead the way…

Kevin shared this three-minute video today which I believe summarizes why Carondelet, as a girl’s school, needs to lead the way.

I also like the shiny gadgets and use of virtual reality (there are resources out there to create virtual reality or use virtual reality resources that we could use right away in all sorts of subjects.

Tech Training Take Two

In his work, Disrupting Class, Clayton Christensen posits that students come to school for only two reasons:

  1. To interact with peers
  2. To feel successful

Every year, 200 students enter Carondelet.  Every year, we spend time before school getting them acquainted with their iPad and learning the systems that teachers expect them to use for class.

For the last two years, Joan and I have tried to find ways that would allow us to deliver this information in a way that would fulfill both of Christensen’s two reasons students come to school.

We decided to rethink how we provided information about what students need to do with their device.  In essence, we made tech the excuse that would allow students to accomplish the Christensen goals instead of making their day here about us and our need to teach them certain tools.

We accomplish this we adopted a Sugatra Mitra approach to learning (his amazing TedTalk below).

The challenge each year is to design a class that renders the two of us all but obsolete and forces them to interact and engage with each other.

Joan Tracy and I discuss what the students need to do.  Joan gets inspired and builds magic resources using Schoology as the platform.

Both years the course is different but the format is pretty much identical.  We basically want them to struggle with each other and to figure things out and not depend on us to be the purveyors of knowledge.

Why?  Because “I Can, and I Will” is our battle cry after all, right?

The fear with these systems, is people think it renders the teacher obsolete… I would beg to differ… It makes the teacher more indispensable.  Designing, creating, providing an environment of trust in which they can explore and learn does not happen in a vacuum.  True, Joan and I are not center stage, but the reality is, we probably never should have been…

Tech Standards? Really?

When we throw around the term 21st Century Learner, we tend to immediately connect that to technology.   Despite my proclivity for tech, I have to say that is so reductionist that I almost dislike using the term and wish something else would come in its place.  For me tech is the tool that allows us to approach teaching and learning differently, shifting the balance of power from teacher to student.

I attended the ISTE conference this summer and was pleasantly surprised when they revealed their new standards for students and teachers (admin standards coming soon)…

I want to share a couple of the resources here (the whole batch is on the Schoology Intranet) as I think they are extremely useful for teachers struggling with what it means to best use tech in their classroom… hint, it is a mindset not a formula…

First:  The Rap, What is a 21st Century Learner