Student Work Published on KQED Website

Just before break, sophomore English classes participated in KQED’s Media Challenge: “Rethink School with MindShift”. The project required students to write an argumentative commentary for a two-minute video or oral presentation on the topic of how we could reimagine school.

The most popular topics in my classes were: uniforms, school start times, homework load, and self-paced math.

While students were encouraged to publish their videos to the KQED Youth Media Showcase, so far I’ve only had one student submit her video. And it’s fantastic. I’m so proud of Annabelle Chung for representing Carondelet on this national platform. 

To learn more about the challenge, and other KQED Youth Media Challenges, go here.


Always New Lessons Learned

Sometimes it feels like being a teacher is being a sorter. We sort papers, sort lesson plans, and sort through our calendars. And with so many students, we often sort them into the categories to which we feel they belong. Usually this is based on some combination of academic ability, effort and behavior. There are high-flyers, overachievers, mid-packers, strugglers, Ivy League, U.C., Cal State, D.V.C., future CEO’s, future managers, future receptionists, future “I hope they don’t screw ups”. Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, Slytherin.

While grades often feel like the crystallization of all of our sorting, I’ve been wondering how much my own biases play into it. Whether I’m conscious of it or not, my approach to teaching many students is often impacted by the category I have placed them in. This might be based on something I heard from a previous teacher, or how courteous they are when they walk into class, or the tone of their parents’ emails, or whether or not they understand my lesson on thesis statements. While this can be helpful in some ways, I think it can also be problematic because it limits the range of expectations I have for my students.

A few weeks ago, I came across this quote: “The ability to observe without evaluating is the highest form of intelligence” (Krishnamurti). As I think of ways to apply this to my teaching, I’m tempted to think of this as a refutation of grading, which would be convenient, but miss the point. The more I grapple with this quote, the more it calls on my teacher self to strive to see my students for who they truly are, and not project my own limited ideas of who they are.

Recently I was thinking about a lesson I learned from my own kids while teaching each of them to ride a bike. Lucas, my older son, got to a point when he was ready for me to take off his training wheels. I had begun to notice that while he rode, he could find that balance and the clanking training wheels would silence for brief moments. My strategy was to do what I have always seen dads do on television – I took the training wheels off and ran alongside him so he could get the feel of riding. Then I started taking my hands off until I was confident that he understood the balance. This moment was absolute joy, the transfer of understanding and his own new independence. He called out to me, “I’m doing it Dad!” Pure Hollywood magic. He was now a member of the category called “bike rider”.

Evan, on the other hand, was different. When the three of us would go on bike rides around the neighborhood, Lucas and I were trailed by the cacophony of Evan’s clanking training wheels. He relied on them so much that they were beginning to grind down to little nubs. There was no moment when he seemed ready for them to come off; he just reached an age where I didn’t want him to be embarrassed that he couldn’t ride a bike yet. On our first attempt without training wheels, I quickly realized he was nowhere close to riding on his own. He had absolutely no sense of balance and would even turn the handle bars abruptly while I ran alongside him. To let go would have only resulted in a bloodied kid.

We went through a cycle of doing this every week or so, but the result was always the same: me shaking my head in my garage, putting the training wheels back on yet again. I honestly worried that the kid would just never learn to ride a bike. What had worked perfectly with Lucas was clearly not working here.

After a few months of frustration, I decided to go to the internet. I was so fixed on the idea that there was one way to teach your kid to ride a bike, that I couldn’t imagine other possibilities. A brief search led me to one suggestion that I find a grassy hill, and have the kid ride down without pedaling first to understand the balance. Then do the same with pedaling. That Saturday we packed up the bikes and went to Arbolado Park. We went to the top of the hill and I explained the method to Evan. Ten minutes later he was riding a bike across the entire grassy field. Five minutes after that, he added the sidewalk and rode back to me. It was that easy.

This is one of my most valuable lessons as a parent, and is also something that I often think about in my teaching. If I had simply assessed the bike riding abilities of my two kids from the beginning and believed in these categories, Evan never would have learned. It took me a while to realize that I was evaluating his performance by what I had experienced with his older brother. It wasn’t until I was able to see him for who he is and adapt my approach accordingly that he was able to succeed.

I see a similar dynamic in my kids’ academic performance too. Things that come quickly to Lucas do not come as quickly to Evan. But that doesn’t mean he won’t get it; it just means we need to find a grassy hill method to help him learn. I’ve talked to him about this, and he is aware that he learns differently from his brother. But I also emphasize that there is no higher value to either learning style. In fact, Carol Dweck might argue that learning to struggle and persevere will serve Evan better in the long run.

This is a reminder of the need to differentiate my approach with my students. I need to look beyond the categories I might want to place them in and believe that all of them can meet my learning objectives. The pace and pathway will look a little different for each one. One silver lining about teaching through a pandemic is that I have learned to use so many tech tools that give me immediate, concrete data about how well my students did on any given lesson. The challenge now is to use the data and create grassy hills that give all students access to learning.

A few weeks into the pandemic, my boys dusted off their bikes and started to ride around the neighborhood. Over the months, riding bikes has become a daily activity, and they now ride with neighborhood kids every afternoon after school. This is something that didn’t happen when their schedules were packed with sports. The other day I was outside and Evan called out for me to watch him. When I looked up, he was actually riding with no hands down the street. I’m so grateful that I was able to get out of my own way and learn about grassy hills.

Reconnecting With a Teacher From My Past

 

As to be expected, AP Literature is heavily focused on literary analysis. And by the end of the first semester, I had a hunch my students needed a breather. So where do you think I turned for inspiration?

To the ENGLISH tab of my 1992-93 high school binder, of course. Yes, I’ve held onto that handy resource, and it has helped me more than once.

This time around, I pulled out a memorable exercise and adapted it for FlipGrid. Students had to list three favorite “sensory details” for each of the five senses, plus a sixth category, an “all around good feeling.” I shared from my own 28-year-old list in a video and presented them with the challenge.

Wow. So delightfully refreshing. It filled me with good feelings for my students and reminded me what it’s like to be 17 or 18. One student described “the sound of opening a new can of tennis balls” and another held up her hands with crooked fingers to show the “all-around good feeling” she experiences when someone grabs onto a chain link fence.

Resurrecting my old list, complete with comments and a sticker from my teacher, put me in a sentimental mood. I wanted to tell her how much she meant to me. I majored in English and became a teacher in part because of her. I don’t so much remember the lessons and lectures and insights about novels that I learned as I remember how I felt in her class. Mrs. Baron treated us with respect. She wanted to know who we were and what we thought. She delighted in her students and supported our becoming young adults by giving us the space to express ourselves and make mistakes. She made me feel interesting and valued. I recall lots of laughter and bonding with my classmates. Her classroom was a special space during a transformative time.

I don’t know why it took me so long to tell her all of this. Perhaps that’s just part of the loveliness of being a self-involved teenager and young adult. And then I didn’t become a teacher for the first 20 years after college.

But the time seemed right over Christmas break, and thanks to the internet I found her. We Zoomed this morning (yay for Zoom!). Anticipation had me emotional for a week. Gratitude, sentimentality, a sense of coming full circle: to be teaching AP Lit now (with three of the same texts on the syllabus) … well, it’s simply a blessing beyond words.

Christine Baron is just as I remembered her. Just as other-centering and gracious. Just as supportive, spirited, and wonderful. She is the type of teacher I want to be. And lucky me, she has offered to stay in touch.

Perhaps with regular contact, I will be able to do more than replicate her assignments. I hope to channel Mrs. Baron’s love and delight. To not lose sight of the preciousness of each of the young people who come into my care on their way to adulthood.

Voice, Choice, and Ownership in PBL





Have you considered doing more project-based learning in your classroom but have concerns
about planning projects properly, using class time wisely, and teaching standards effectively?
With these concerns in mind, Michelle Koski and I attended a PBL Design Camp at High Tech High
in San Diego, and here are some highlights of what we learned:

  1. Planning projects can be time-consuming but is doable and worth it.
  2. Yes, you can have traditional standards-based teaching with PBL, and you should!
  3. There is no “right” way to begin or plan a project.
  4. Ask students for their feedback, not just after the project but before and during the project as well.
  5. Students are PROUD of their work (not their grade).
Voice, Choice and Ownership in PBL! So, how does that happen?
At High Tech High’s PBL Design Camp, middle and high school educators from all over the country came together, each with the spark of an idea for a project. By working with their school partners and hearing critique from other camp participants, they were able to develop a project that suited the needs of their students and their teachers. 
Michelle and I are two such participants who have benefitted from the PBL design process. The idea for our cross-curricular project came while discussing two independent projects we do for our students. My Dystopian Fiction students write dystopian scenes that focus on world building, character development and action sequences. Michelle’s Costume and Fashion Design students create costumes for plays based on fashion trends. For our project, we have decided to combine the two and have Michelle’s students design costumes for my students’ writing. My writer’s will pitch their story ideas to her designers who will choose a partner to work with. The partners will meet regularly during the design phase of the costumes to work on revisions of both the writing and the costumes. 
We plan to conduct this project during fourth quarter. Here is what we hope to gain in terms of learning outcomes:
  • Both classes will learn the process of critique and revision
  • As writers, Dystopian Fiction students will learn to clearly communicate their vision with sensory imagery and vivid language.
  • As designers, Costume and Fashion Design students will learn to collaborate and communicate with a “client” in order to create a product that reflects more than the artist’s vision.

Stay tuned for the results of our project…


Talking It Out

   

     I want to talk about my junior final. Tiz, Jeff and I just concluded a short, three-week unit to finish up the semester. We wanted to end the year with an SEL based unit, so we exposed students to literature loosely based on the theme of self-love. Over the course of the last couple of weeks, students read and analyzed various poems and pieces of literature. They practiced annotating and discussing how these types of shorter works are created, so there was heavy emphasis on writer’s craft/literary devices during class lessons.
     I’m really happy with the writing they produced for the final, and I think that one reason the writing is decent is because of the process they were required to work through. Over the course of the last three weeks, students practiced this process several times. That helped. On the day of the final, students were introduced to two brand-new pieces of literature. Together we read through them; they had pencil in hand. Then, students had to quickly choose which piece of literature they were going to work through for their final writing piece. Once students chose which text they liked, they had about 6 minutes to annotate it by themselves. After that, each student had to find a peer, who chose the same piece of literature, and they discussed each other’s annotations/ideas. I think this is such a valuable step in the process; Tiz and I discussed how our best ideas often come from talking it out. After their talking time, they wrote. Once all the prewriting steps were completed, students had about an hour to write for the final.
      I’m now grading these writing pieces, and they’re not bad. Students are talking about the tone of literature and how that tone was created. I’ve found that students were mostly successful in articulating these in a clear and concise fashion. I’m happy. Really, I feel like I won just getting 16/17 year olds to write for an hour, not on SnapChat.

Lemonade from Lemons

Yesterday, I had a not so great interaction with a student, which left me feeling really bad and it ended up consuming my entire night-yes, I woke up at 2 a.m. thinking about this kid. Why? Oh, why do we have to care so much? Anyway, every year I inevitably have a couple interactions with students that I wish could have gone better, which is par for the course when you work with people, especially teenagers. Many years ago, I realized one way to counteract the way these unfortunate interactions make me feel is to write positive emails to parents of students with which I’ve had great interactions. Fortunately, these positive interactions way out number the negative ones, like by 1000%! Here is a sampling of a few emails I sent this morning:

Dear Mr. and Mrs __________, 
Good morning! I’m writing just to let you know that it has been an absolute pleasure working with _________ this year. He is a great kid! _________ is a joy to be around; he always listens attentively and consistently contributes to our classroom community. I am so happy that he is in my class! 
Have a wonderful day and God bless!
Sincerely,
Mrs. Cutright
Dear Mr. and Mrs. ___________,

I just want to send a quick note to acknowledge what a great kid you have. I am ________’s English teacher this year, and I feel very lucky to have her in my class. I went to England with ____________ a couple of summers ago and I see how she positively influenced her peers during that trip. I get to see another side of her in the classroom. ___________ is hard-working and interested in learning. She really is a joy to be around!
I hope you have a wonderful day.
Sincerely,
Mrs. Cutright
When the time is right, I am going to revisit the conversation I had with the student of yesterday and try again. In the meantime, I do feel better. What do you do when you have a not so awesome interaction with another human?

The Seven Samurai


This past
Friday afternoon, the members of the English Department got together after
school to take on The Warrior’s Way challenge at Red Door Escape Room. When we
all arrived, our game master took us down a dim hallway with closed doors on
either side. Behind the doors we could hear the frenzied sounds of people
trying to escape, and even a few screams when a masked game master jumped into
a room and scared his group. Our game master wore a Where’s Waldo costume, and
immediately informed us that we were about to undertake an advanced-level
escape room challenge. I took this as a compliment that Kevin must have had
great confidence in our department when he signed us up.
With very
few clues and little context, our game master split us up into two groups and
locked us into two parallel rooms, where we had to puzzle our way through the
samurai kitsch if we wanted to be reunited. Undaunted by this first challenge,
we used our communication skills (after all, we are English teachers), which
included knocking on the wall to one another, and we quickly made it to a second
room where we came together again. In this room Kate mastered the steps of
Akido, Tiz honed her Samurai sword skills, Lisa utilized her tea-sniffing
skills, and Leila saved the day by simply standing up from the bench she was
sitting on to allow a trap door to open.
This took
us to the next room, a samurai library of sorts, and the clock on the wall
reminded us that we only had a few short minutes to make it out. With the clock
ticking down, we had to harness our inner-samurai calm to solve a puzzle that
involved the different tones of bells. With very little assistance from the
game master, we dashed out of the escape room with only 58 seconds on the clock.
We made it out, triumphant, and all of the game masters were in awe that we had
made it through their challenge so quickly. More importantly though, we worked
together as a team and laughed together on a Friday afternoon. It was a great
way to start the weekend, and reminded me of how grateful I am to work with
such a dynamic department.

The Ongoing Grading Conundrum

I used to be the King of Grading. Self-anointed, I walked
around school with a huge stack of essays under my arm and a red pen behind my
ear. Many nights I’d head out to Peets after putting my kids to bed, and grind
through essays until the workers started mopping the floor to close. Then I’d
come home, still jacked up on caffeine and grade a few more, quitting when the
words started blurring. Life was a constant tally of the paper load. A passable
day would be ten, a fair day fifteen, and there were a few epic bender weekend
days where I could touch forty.
I burned through red pens in those days and left the essays
bleeding with feedback. I considered myself a master at articulating personal
writing advice that would make each student more aware of her writing self. I
was part judge, part coach, part machine. It became my mission to give students
feedback that would present a clear path towards improvement.  
Before each class began, I returned the work I had graded
face down on the desks. The anxiety in the room was thick, as students entered
and began flipping over the papers. But instead of diving into my feedback and
considering my carefully articulated suggestions, most students just looked at
the grade on top and put the essay away. Often, they would ask the nearest
classmate what she had gotten to affirm their own place in the class hierarchy.
It made me wonder how many of my comments were read, let alone applied to
future writing assignments.
My feedback in those days started to feel like a
justification of the grade more than anything else. I learned early on that many
Carondelet parents really care about
their daughters’ grades. Those parents had a strong voice, and I needed a
well-mounted defense before the attack came. While I would sometimes force my
students to read my comments, or write metacognitive responses to my feedback,
most of that time I had spent gouging away at their essays had merely been for
the possibility (and hope) that something would happen afterwards.
Grading and assessment has always felt like one of the holes in my teaching. I’m sure that’s why I overcompensated for so many
years by pouring feedback onto every piece of writing. I have used many
different rubrics in many different ways, but I still feel like this last piece
of my students’ writing process is lacking. One challenge is having so many
students, and knowing that they need to write often to really grow. We all know
that feedback is best when immediate, but how can we orchestrate that with 150
students? Staggering major assignments can only buy so much time. Is carefully
crafted feedback that comes back two weeks later better than cursory feedback
given two days later? My gut tells me that the value of any feedback diminishes with each passing day.
So here I find myself, rocketing into another school year,
still searching for the magic bullet that will resolve my issues with assessing
writing. Despite my best intentions, once the essays start coming in, I usually
settle for whatever works to keep the paper flow from bogging down. I still don’t
know if rubrics are best, or wholistic grading is best, or conferencing is best.
I suspect that a paper saturated with red ink is overwhelming, but how much
feedback should I give to really direct my students? Does every piece of work
that students turn in deserve credit that impacts the grade, or should a grade
be truly an assessment of student skills and mastery? What about portfolios?
And how do I take something as complex as a piece of writing and use some hocus-pocus translation to quantify it with a number? Eighty-seven or eighty-eight?
Seventy-two or seventy-three? Can someone get a hundred? Why sixty?
As with many aspects of teaching, I’m left with more
questions than answers. And that’s with twenty years of experience. But I
remind myself that this is what also draws me to the field of education. It is
such an ever-changing puzzle, and correct answers are slippery and transform
with time. If you’re not able to face constant ambiguity, this profession can
make you crazy. Fortunately, I kind of like puzzles.
I started this blog intending to declare that this is the
year I face the assessment question head on. I’m working as part of a team of
English 2 teachers who are recreating our curriculum. My team members often
don’t let me settle for what is going to be easiest, which is something I
really value. Tiz has given me two books on grading that are slowly moving
upward on my stack of next books to read. But the papers still keep coming in,
and I need to keep churning them back out. I think the best I can commit to is
wandering out blindly in this direction and see where the journey leads me. Hopefully
my thinking is transformed when I get to the other side. If you have any
epiphanies or struggles, please share – I know there are better ways; I just
don’t know what they look like yet.

Get 5% Better Each Year–What a Relief!

Many of you are aware that I’ve been trying to follow 180 Days by Kelly Gallagher and Penny Kittle. Recently, I attended a day-long workshop by the pair, and they ended with the reminder that we can’t adopt their whole practice at once, but if we can try to get 5% better each year, that will be progress.

Good for me to hear, because at times this year, I felt the authors would be disappointed in me if they knew I had let some things drop. I still have to work against a tendency to see where my practices fell short of the gold standard in 180 Days.

Which prompted me to go back to my notes from last summer. I had jotted down a page of my favorite ideas from the book, the ones I would most want to adopt:

  1. Quickwrites with mentor texts
  2. Write in front of the students
  3. 10-minute reading time at the beginning of class
  4. Have students write more volume but I grade less
  5. Try using criteria instead of rubrics
  6. Get students talking every day
  7. Choice in research
  8. Portfolio grade at the end

Of those eight favorites, I incorporated seven into my teaching practice this year. Woo hoo! Some of the daily activities such as quickwrites and reading didn’t happen every day, but an overall tone was established in my classroom that you are a reader and writer. At the moment, I have stacks of student notebooks on my desk. The volume of their writing makes me so proud of my students. I rarely collected notebooks and gave out nominal points for them. Yet even yesterday, they were writing book reviews and ranking all the books they’d read this year from easiest to hardest.

So yes, more volume and less grading on my part. I also tried out all sorts of single-point rubrics, criteria lists, and other ways to assess, and I tried out methods to reduce my grading time and to get them writing more. (Most recently, students wrote four drafts for a single essay and instead of grading each draft, I graded their overall process + metacognitive comments. More volume, less grading!)

I didn’t get to the portfolio at the end, and I was wisely advised to hold off on that. But I did use a new system of organizing student work in shared Google folders so that by the end of the year, they essentially did have a portfolio. They spent a couple days this week looking back over all their work to reflect on how far they’d come. Next year, I will have a better idea of how to lay the groundwork for a true portfolio project.

The good news is that I have a ton of experience to build on, plus a stack of teacher books to delve into, so that I can refine these wins and improve for next year. I have to fight my perfectionism in order to type this final line: I am proud of my progress.

Instructing Real Audiences on Slime & Somersaults

English
teachers
more
and
more
look
for
authentic
audiences
for
student
writing.
Ive
made
that
one
of
my
endeavors
this
year.
My
students
have
done
a
couple
of
assignments
where
their
audience
is
the
entire
sophomore
class
(
FlipGrid
videos,
and
the
“100-
Word
Memoirs” published to Google Sites which I blogged about already).
I
saw
more
excitement
generated
when
they
were
producing
for
their
peers
instead
of
for
me. I was excited to find another avenue for widening the audience further.
Last
quarter,
my
sophomore
honors
classes
did
some
instructional
writing.
Id
read
an
article
in
the
January
2018 
English Journal by
teacher
Sarah
K.
Gunning
who
argues,
Whether
students
consider
themselves
to
be
writers
or
not,
they
are
affected
by
the
way
directions
are
written
and
interpreted.”
I
adopted
Gunnings
lesson
plan,
which
started
as
an
inquiry
into
students
own
experiences
with
training
and
instructional
manuals
for
their
jobs.
I
reinforced
Gunnings
point
that
writing
affects
everyones
career
so
being
able
to
write
instructions
is
an
important
skill
to
learn.
We
used
a
website
called
Instructables.com
where
anyone
can
post
an
instruction
set
with
photos.
Students
had
to
decide
what
talent
or
skill
they
wanted
to
teach
in
written
steps:
some
chose
easy
recipes,
others
demonstrated
origami,
drawing,
friendship
bracelets,
or
colorful
slime.
One
student
wrote
instructions
about
how
to
do
a
somersault.

But
first,
they
had
to
create
an
imaginary
profile
of
their
target
audience
to
ground
themselves
while
writing
their
directions.
Their
profile
helped
them
decide
what
sort
of
safety
warnings
might
need
to
be
included,
and
the
appropriate
level
of
detail
including
photos
to
include
in
each
step.
After
creating
their
draft
instruction
sets,
students
had
to
perform
usability
testing
by
watching
a
friend
or
family
member
follow
their
instructionswithout
intervening.
They
took
observation
notes
about
where
their
instruction
sets
would
need
adjustment
based
on
the
success
or
failure
of
the
test
subject.
Usability
testing
served
as
reallife
qualitative
feedback.
The
beauty
was
that
once
I
set
the
project
in
motion,
I
was
not
the
expert
handing
out
feedback.
As
Gunning
states,
Removing
the
teacher
from
the
evaluation
aspect  may increase a students vision of value for what an audience brings to the writing process.”
Finally,
students
published
their
instruction
sets
on
the
Instructables
website
and
awaited
comments
and
likes
and
page
views,
which
provide
exciting
quantitative
feedback
as
Gunning
points
out.
The
only
snag
in
this
whole
project
was
that
Instrutables.com
may
not
be
robust
enough
to
handle
a
rush
of
71
student
users!
We
had
some
technical
issues
for
some
students
who
found
it
to
be
more
timeconsuming
and
frustrating
to
publish
than
Id
wanted.
Overall,
they
enjoyed
the
project.
My
evaluation
was
tied
to
a
reflective
piece
where
students
described
how
usability
testing
affected
their
final
instruction
set
and
asked
what
they
learned
about
instructional
writing
from
the
process.
Said
one
sophomore,
Having the audience shift from just a teacher to anyone in the world changed the way I wrote instructions because with writing to a teacher you know exactly who the audience is. With this project, it is important to write instructions that a variety of people could follow along with, because you dont know who will view your project. …
I have learned that instructional writing is harder than it looks. When you cant point to or show the person what exactly to do, you are forced to rely on descriptive and precise wording to explain what to do.”