DEI and CRT Are Poison

 It’s time for a confession. I love watching PragerU videos. Imagine Fox News with evidence and logic instead of ranting and raving. They make me pause and question. They make me realize there are some pretty smart people out there who are not on my side of the fence. There are so many lessons I could open with a viewing of a PragerU video.

Watch the video, “Miseducated: The Decline of America’s Schools.” Here are some essential questions posed by PragerU. After watching the video, how might you answer each of these questions? 


“Why are schools obsessed with race and gender issues? Why are children learning revisionist history? Why are America’s schools teaching children to hate America — and each other?”

Your answers might come in handy the next time a parent or neighbor asks the same questions.


Racism Revealed

My U.S. History class just finished our unit on civil rights. I began the unit with a wonderful two period long lecture enhanced with a slide show and  punctuated with stimulating questions to be discussed and written about in team breakout rooms. We covered everything from the first American slave to Black Lives Matter. Thought-provoking ideas abounded. The discussion breaks evoked many questions from the students. So much information was delivered with such great success. I was so proud of how well I pulled off this “sage on the stage” extravaganza. 

Our second assignment was about racism today. Each student from each team was required to select a topic from a list including such topics as de facto segregation and racism in education. No teammate could select the same subject. Each teammate would then, jigsaw fashion, create a Flipgrid video about their subject and present it to their team. The best video, as chosen by the teammates, for each team was shared with the whole class. My only role in this assignment was to be a “guide on the side,” answering questions and providing encouragement. 

After completing the unit I assigned my standard feedback questions.

  • What did you like or find most interesting? Be specific. Select one thing.
  • What did you least like or understand? Be specific. Select one thing.
  • What questions or random thoughts came to mind while you were studying this unit?

Overwhelmingly students liked the student created videos. They told about all the interesting things they learned and how surprised they were by information they did not know. There were many questions about the content of the videos. A few students even mentioned my lecture, but it was a far second to the comments about the student-created videos. That’s where the learning took place; not my slideshow extravaganza.

This experience confirms once again that even my best direct instruction does not equal student driven learning. Finding information for themselves is so much more powerful and memorable than my telling them. Student research is foundational for a successful lesson. The product can be an essay, a video, a discussion or a presentation. These help students cement their learning, but student centered research is the key. I now see my main job as teaching students how to conduct their own research on topics that converge their interests with the topics I am teaching. The reporting is essential but the research is foundational. Even though this is not a new theory, it continues to amaze me with its success in building skills and as a vehicle for long term learning. Students will not soon forget what they and their classmates discovered about racism as it exists today. And how about that first slave, John Punch? A month from now, students will have no clue.

Thinking about White Privilege

It’s MLK Day and I’m thinking about his legacy. I’m thinking about the people in the civil rights movement and how the sheer force of their vision changed the trajectory of this country.  I’m thinking about the courage and sacrifice of regular people who chose to engage. I’m thinking what I can do these days … which makes me think about:

  • white privilege, our students, and what I can do to address systemic racism, economic injustice, and inequality  
  • how can I have more conversations that shift thinking so that my students understand these large social systems and desire to lead lives that change the systems?  
  • the way white privilege impacts the experience of our Black, Latina, Asian, Middle Eastern, and mixed race students?
  • am I/are we more aware of and sensitive to the needs/experiences/feelings of white students than I am/we are aware of and sensitive to the needs/experiences/feelings of our non-white students?
Angela Davis says “in a racist society, it is not enough to be non-racist, we must be antiracist”.  What does that look like?  And why is the concept of white privilege so unpleasant and unpopular? Maybe- some white people 
  • don’t want to believe they live in a world where much of they’ve been told about fairness is wrong?
  • want to believe in the American dream – hard work pays off and good things happen to good people?
  • want to believe they alone have “earned” their privilege?
  • don’t think they have any privilege at all because they can’t see it (like a fish not seeing water)?
  • don’t want to think of themselves as ignorant about how the world works?
  • don’t want to think they have (knowingly or unkowingly) harmed or are harming people?
  • are not readily aware of the discrimination and unconscious and structural biases black and brown people face every day? 

What does white privilege even mean? To me, it means that a white person generally has a set of built in advantages that others do not. It isn’t “something I take and which I therefore have the option of not taking. It is something that society gives me, and unless I change the institutions which give it to me, they will continue to give it, and I will continue to have it, however noble and equalitarian my intentions.” (Harry Brod)  White privilege is “having greater access to power and resources than people of color [in the same situation] do”. (Teaching Tolerance)

It’s my experience that the hardest part about having conversations about white privilege, racial and economic injustice in the classroom is getting to a point where students 1) feel safe and that their opinions matter  2) try to use language that honors their own experience/ideas but doesn’t degrade anyone else’s 3) are empathetic  4) are willing to learn something new and not just cling to their original perspective.

For our white students, I am thinking about how to help them not be offended when someone asks them to “check their privilege”.  What is being asked is that the white person examine – stop and consider – how the advantages they’ve had in their life might be contributing to their position, opinions and actions.  And maybe to consider how the lack of disadvantage in certain areas is keeping them from fully understanding the struggles of others.  Acknowledging that systemic racism and economic injustice exist means challenging what we know about race, class, and wealth in this country – not easy – but if we don’t work to change the system, we might be contributing to the struggles of those who have suffered enough.

With my juniors in Symbols and Ethics we’re watching a movie called Paper City and will be using some of the lesson plans from the accompanying educational program.  Paper City is a film inspired by MLK’s last book: Where Do We Go From Here? Chaos or Community?  As we analyze the systems, social norms, and historical events that created a drug infested violent situation in Holyoke MA, maybe some shifts will take place and we all can see more clearly the disadvantages facing youths in Holyoke (and other communities) because of racial and economic disparities.

With this issue and others that are so contentious, my objective is that my students will be more inclined to listen deeply to others’ experiences and be equipped with some social analysis strategies, such as the “critical reflection cycle”, the “pastoral circle”, the “conflict resolution method”, or design think.  I’m also hoping my students can connect these issues to the principles of Catholic Social Teaching (i.e. human dignity, preferential option for the poor and vulnerable, solidarity), which is basically how the Church applies the Gospels to current events and social issues.

Talking about privilege makes a classroom of students squirm – some want to talk about it but most don’t; they don’t want to cause a fight or hurt anyone’s feelings.  It makes me nervous too, but I’m white and have benefited from the system so I don’t get to avoid the issue.  I’ve been told from black colleagues and learned from reading that part of white privilege is the ability to remain silent about race issues or in the face of racist activity.  If we understand systemic racism and economic injustice and do nothing about it, we’re in collusion with the system that set it up. What to do? What does being “antiracist” look like to you?  What kinds of things are you doing in your classroom that challenge the status quo and change the system?   Is there anything else we can do to explore ways that race, privilege, prejudice and structural inequality might be affecting our Black, Latina, Asian, Middle Eastern, and mixed race students?

 
Lastly, these are a few books (above) I’d like to read and am wondering if anyone else would like to read and discuss in a group?

The Summer of My PD Tropism



The Summer of My PD Tropism!








This poem and sweet image were on Parker Palmer’s facebook page last week.  As with much he writes or shares – it moved me deeply – and the reference to tropism intrigued me.  After some research and reflection I realized that it captures my lived experience.  Tropism is the turning of an organism in a certain direction in response to an external stimulus. The reaction is involuntary and can happen as a negative or positive response to signals from the environment.  For better or worse I am highly influenced by others and the events around me – and tend to turn my energy in their direction.


My tropism is particularly strong when I get overwhelmed and a lot is happening – I turn and turn and get dizzy. Throughout this last year there has been A LOT happening: the vitriol in America politics just keeps getting worse, the unbearable tragedy at our border continues to unfold, violence against our women and mother earth progresses, crises in the Catholic Church (clergy sex abuse, young people fleeing fast, polarization between conservative/liberals, absence of female leadership) abound, Islamaphobia is rising, global chaos threatens us, and toping it off wasa confusing and difficult professional evaluation process here at Carondelet – this ALL had me turning upside and down – right and left: tropism got the better of me! 



So – in an effort to be proactive and productive – to make the most of this tropism moving me and forcing me to face these issues and problems  – I signed up for a boat load of summer professional development workshops and conferences.  And – happy dance!!! – registration fees were waived for everything I attended – ask and you shall receive! 








My first workshop (my first move) was sponsored by the Sophia Institute.  Called Encountering God’s Love in the Sacraments, it took place at St. Stephen’s Church in Walnut Creek.  (I have a thumb drive with all Sophia Institute resources if anyone is interested.)  The style of this workshop was old school – static – traditional PD stuff. We sat and listened to presentations delivered by a theology professor and staff member; looked at detailed power points; and answered questions about their resources. It did little to edify or challenge me, although I did like their use of art to explore the sacraments – and have used it in my Symbols and Ethics classes.








Next move was to a Facing History and Ourselves (FHA)) workshop called Community Matters: Facing History’s Approach to Advisory @ Arise High School in Oakland.  If you have not been to a FHAO workshop you are missing out – the FHFO pedagogical Scope and Sequence and Advisory rational are well worth your time if you have some.  This workshop had us moving around the room completing challenges and sharing with one another.  It had us switching our student, teacher, and human being hats/roles all the time. We explored ways to build understanding and empathy with our students, break down stereotypes, help students find and build their own voices, and connect on a deeper level with one another.  The official day ended with an circle experience where teachers completed the sentence: “if you really knew me, you would know that … “. One of the teachers completed the sentence with “I was on the BART train the night that Oscar Grant was killed.”  






  



After that I TURNED towards a two day conference at the Hoover Institute at Stanford called Accelerating Peace: Interfaith Action in Global Peacemaking put on by the United Religions Initiative (Conference Agenda) was AMAZING!  It “brought peacebuilders from around the world together to discuss challenges to peace, both in their local communities and on an international level, and to realize action-oriented solutions benefitting all of humanity.”  



Here is who I got to see and hear:



  • H.E. Adama Dieng, United Nations Secretary-General’s Special Adviser for the Prevention of Genocide
  • Former US Secretary of Defense General James Mattis – He was awesome!
  • Sadhvi Bhagawati Saraswati, Secretary-General of the Global Interfaith WASH Alliance (GIWA), a URI Cooperation Circle and President of the Divine Shakti Foundation
  • Valarie Kaur, Founder and Director of the Revolutionary Love Project (💜 her)
  • Rev. William Swing, President and Founding Trustee of URI; Former Episcopal Bishop of California
  • And dozens more … you can see the conference keynotes and video highlights here!



I met a Pakistani priest, James Channan, whom I am now friends with – James just won the National Peace Award from the president of Pakistan .  I met a beautiful new friend who I bonded with when they gave us 15 minutes for coffee and extended it for hours.  Kate runs a phenomenal organization called Contemplative Life – an online hub “connecting people and communities with transformative practices”.  I got to hang out with Jews, Sikhs, Muslims, Buddhists (and more). I got to discuss politics and economics, society and culture, and inter-religious dialogue.  I made local connections – with people from the Interfaith Council of Contra Costa County – and hopefully some of its members will be visiting CHS soon as guest speakers.  




       



I then moved in the direction of an evening workshop called the Catholic Educators Summit: LGBTQIA+ Inclusion in Catholic Schools  at USF (LGBTQIA+ Schedule) – Edie came with me and it was a blast.  Dr. Jane Bleasdale, Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator for Catholic Educational Leadership at USF, was kind, compassionate, wise and intelligent.  She set the context for the conference and spoke via Skype with Kent Hickey, President of Seattle Prep, about how Catholic schools might move from tolerance to inclusion in terms of LGBTQ faculty and staff.  When it comes to our LGBTQ friends, family, and faculty, I feel that the Church could really use a cocktail of reality and compassion – so I was happy to swim in the waters with those who are working for change. 

   

The crown jewel in the summer of my PD tropism was a three day conference put on Facing History and Ourselves called Immigration in a Changing World: Identity, Citizenship, and Belonging @ the Brandeis School of San Francisco.   (Schedule & Overview)  This was exceptional – cutting edge – a game changer!   I loved learning the history of immigration through creative hands-on activities – there was so much I didn’t know about the 1790 Act, the 1917 and 1924 Immigration Acts.  I learned about border history and contemporary border policy by Professor Bill Hing of USF – who was AWESOME! Here is a podcast “Good Law-Bad Law” from August of Prof Hing discussing decriminalization of the border.  I’m designing a mini-unit on immigration for my Symbols and Ethics class and am happy to share it (when I finish it 😟) and as well as all the resources I got from FHAO on the issues of immigration and racism. 

So – that was my summer of PD … my summer of trying to “learn tropism towards the difficult” and trying to “prune back regret to let faith grow” as Kim Stafford put it in the poem above.  I didn’t dedicate all my energy to professional development.  There were also personal and family issues that moved me and called for my attention.  So … I signed up for several online courses which were profoundly valuable, including 
  • 2019 Compassion Course Online with Thom Bond, the Founder and Director of Education of  The New York Center for Nonviolent Communication
  • The 28-Day Mindfulness Challenge by Sean Fargo, Founder of Mindfulness Exercises
It seems like a lot and it was – but I needed it.  As much as I love teaching, I need to be taught!!!  I need information, inspiration, formation, connection.  I need to be fed. And I felt full and more grounded when school started.