Class Question#1: Can anyone tell me what a blog is? Class Question #2: Raise your hand if you have ever read a blog. |
Class Question#1: Can anyone tell me what a blog is? Class Question #2: Raise your hand if you have ever read a blog. |
More than twenty years of teaching high school religious studies – twelve in all girls’ schools – combined with my own spiritual/intellectual/emotional/professional evolution, make me more eager than ever to advocate for changes in the way we teach and talk to girls about God. Most children and teens are given the impression that God is an old white man. The message is transmitted indirectly in many ways: Catholic school religion classes, youth ministry programs, Church life, masculine pronouns and metaphors used for God, the almost exclusively male images of the divine, the depiction of heavens filled with male whiteness, and the masculine language dominating Church doctrine.
Girls don’t just have a hard time seeing themselves in God’s image – many find it hard to see themselves in the Church at all. There’s a lack of meaningful roles for them. Their voices and visions aren’t cherished. Their needs are not prioritized. This consolidation of white male power goes back a long way but it was consolidated during the Reformation which “enforced the need for apologetical theology and a closed system of power and authority. The clergy were trained in such an environment, giving rise to an elitism, as if their well-honed philosophical arguments and theological methods gave them private access to God over the hoi polloi.”(Ilia Delio) The absence of women in the institutional Church – and the embedded ideology/imagery of white maleness can shift. At Carondelet we may think that because we empower our students inside and outside the classroom and are fully committed to their liberation, that they wouldn’t be vulnerable to this religious oppression, but that’s not true. Inspiring our students to activate a new Christian culture is possible but it will take a lot more intentional work.
Yes: Christianity developed in a patriarchal society.
Yes: the historical Jesus was male.
Yes: Jesus used male analogies when describing his relationship to God.
Yes: only men – almost all white men – have held leadership positions in the Church.
Yes: our theology was developed by men who wrote the gospels & letters, and the early “Fathers of the Church” who explained scripture, and male theologians interpreting that tradition.
Yes: Catholic scripture and tradition have contributed to this misconception by systematically referring to God in masculine terms.
But God is Spirit – the Spirit who created the universe 13.8 billion years ago – God is Being/Consciousness Itself – God is “I Am Who Am” – God is Mystery – God is Love. God is the Christocentric Energy who took on flesh 2000 years ago in a remote region of the Roman Empire in a male body. However, the maleness of Jesus is not a “revelation of the maleness of God nor of the divinity of males – but a free self-emptying by which he participated in the oppressor class of humanity, thereby definitively undermining not only patriarchy but all forms of oppression derived from it”. (Sandra Schneiders)
God has no gender, race, ethnicity, color. And Catholic education can’t keep perpetuating the same ideology/aesthetic/sensibility. Our understanding of God, humanity, creation, and religion has evolved – but the structures of the Catholic Church and the way we talk and teach about God haven’t. We need to shift what is passed on through our social, cultural, religious especially educational institutions to reflect this change. Our girls deserve it and need it.
What are the consequences when girls are inundated with messages that God is old, white, and male? What is the impact when girls don’t feel valued in the institutional Church? I’ve observed that they can lose the inclination to see themselves as God-like – holy and sacred – and they lose interest in participating in Church life. I’ve been asking students for years and it always makes me weep. Below are some of the responses I got last week from my sophomores (I can share the full peardeck responses with you if you’re interested). See for yourself.
I don’t want to perpetuate the transmission of this old paradigm. I do try every day to talk and teach and pray and engage differently. I believe we are creating a different culture at Carondelet. Edie and the Campus Ministry team have taken a huge step this year by emphasizing inclusive language in our prayers and liturgies – and in our embrace of the “Creator, Redeemer, Sanctifier” formula for prayer (which does not substitute female imagery for the divine). Our programming celebrates the CSJs who advocate for diversity, equity, and inclusion. In the Religious Studies department we are revising our curriculum to empower out students to explore God’s love and consciousness in fresh ways, interpret scripture, critique patriarchal designs, zoom out to see the bigger cosmological view of Salvation history, and envision themselves as change makers in herstory.
All of us can contribute to this shift. When we pray, teach, and worship we can and should use a variety of sacred images and symbols so that one (the old, male, white one) is not prioritized over others. We can also be more aware of the symbolic nature of language and our use of male pronouns referring to God, perhaps calling God other names such as, Holy God, Creator God, Divine Mystery. I’m curious to hear your ideas – your thoughts – your perspective …
I live with the hope that God is doing new things in each of us, in Christian communities, in the Catholic church, in all wisdom traditions – in creation itself – calling us to unitive creative action and life and love and justice and healing and joy.
I quickly learned after arriving at the University of Iowa for my undergrad that taking religious studies courses was a popular thing to do. One professor in particular, Jay Holstein, blazed a trail at Iowa that included religious studies courses having 500 students in them and being classes that students would sneak into in their free time. A documentary was filmed in 2008 focusing on his work and a short clip from the film can be viewed below to understand the type of educator that he was day in and day out.
This fall marked his 50th year anniversary of teaching at the University of Iowa and they celebrated him with a live streamed event including former students, his family, and his Golden Lecture. To hear him lecture again was an absolute gift. One quote he said stood out to me the most and that was:
“Education leads to uncertainty. Things that were simple are now complicated… Don’t be afraid of uncertainty. Be suspicious of certainty.”
Through innovation, social emotional learning, growth mindset, and effective teaching, we are introducing our students to the complicated and the uncertain and we are teaching them to not be afraid. That curiosity and that confidence in questioning anything and everything will be valuable to our students forever.
Spending this first month of the school year doing distance learning has made it hard for me to evaluate my own teaching. The measurable data I had from class interactions previously, doesn’t exist anymore and this can lead to self doubt as a teacher. This can (and does) lead to taking every comment about our teaching as more valuable.
I recently had a conversation about one of the classes that I teach that I believe is going really well. Very well considering that it is via distance learning. The conversation didn’t include what I believed was happening. I discovered that the virtual world is more isolating and invisible than when someone could come into the class and see learning in action. What is visible to the outside world (those excluding the teacher and students) is a Schoology page. The conversations via zoom have been and gone, the laughs and “now I get it” moments have been left in the virtual realm. Sadly my impression to the outside world is minimal.
This week after hearing voices in my mind questioning whether I am a good teacher, I decided to do something about it. This isn’t new or revolutionary. In fact it’s a requirement as a teacher here at Carondelet. I did class surveys asking what items helped the students learn new concepts and what parts of my class have and haven’t been successful for learning (Schoology included). Simply I went to the source to find out whether my self doubt was accurate.
I know you’re wondering what my students said. Before I tell you I invite you to ask your students too. They see you every week and know all the hard work you’re doing. The responses that I received that were about all their classes expressed an appreciation that every teacher is truly doing his/her best.
So the results came in. Simply I can tell you that my students don’t see my as a non-effective teacher, one that is unclear about what he is teaching, or even as someone who doesn’t care. My most positive response was that they feel that I am approachable. That is huge for me. It has actually been my most positive evaluation from students in regards to helping them (in teaching and assessing) to be successful students. The written comments were positive, especially the ones that were specific to me. My favourite was “I really enjoy how you do distance learning.” Also a shout out to Ms. Orr, Mr. Ward and Mr. Buckles that students gave praise to on their online teaching. Basically my students expressed that they are happy, they are learning, and that what they do in class is valuable.
I finished teaching my last period on Friday and I’m thankful to have positive voices in my mind acknowledging that I am doing a good job in the classroom. I hope you take the time to hear from the students and take those same positive words to heart.
I always want to show the students how math is connected to other subjects and the real world. Frankly, one of my big dreams for our math program is not to get more girls to calculus (but YAY! if that happens). Rather my dream is that it starts to blow up the idea of “time” and “school day” enough that we can start to incorporate cross-curricular time in the day. How cool would it be if instead of teaching dimensional analysis in physics and again in algebra, we taught it concurrently in the context of a bigger problem? But how do we inch towards this?
This year I have tried two cross-curricular projects:
I love football. I grew up a 49ers fan, my best friends played football throughout middle and high school, switched to the Packers as an adult (Go Pack Go!), and fell in love with the Hawkeyes while I attended college at the University of Iowa. When I became a teacher, I went to every football game, hosted pregame meals in my classroom, and talked about the game in the hallways to any and all students who would listen.
I knew about CTE (Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy). The great Junior Seau had commited suicide while I was in college. In September of 2015, my favorite football player while I was a college student, one that I had bought the #9 jersey of, Tyler Sash, died at the age of 27. The cause of death? Mixture of drugs. But that didn’t sit well with any of us Hawkeye fans. Five months later it was revealed that he was in Stage 2 of CTE with comparable damage to that of Junior Seau who died at 43.
“Early symptoms of CTE usually appear in a patient’s late 20s or 30s, and affect a patient’s mood and behavior. Some common changes seen include impulse control problems, aggression, depression, and paranoia. As the disease progresses, some patients may experience problems with thinking and memory, including memory loss, confusion, impaired judgment, and eventually progressive dementia. Cognitive symptoms tend to appear later than mood and behavioral symptoms, and generally first appear in a patient’s 40s or 50s. Patients may exhibit one or both symptom clusters. In some cases, symptoms worsen with time (even if the patient suffers no additional head impacts). In other cases, symptoms may be stable for years before worsening” (www.concussionfoundation.org).
In April of 2017, Aaron Hernandez, former Florida Gator and New England Patriot powerhouse, convicted of murder, was found dead in his jail cell. About five months later, it was revealed that he was in stage 3 of CTE with damage well beyond was could be expected for someone his age. The Netflix documentary “Killer Inside: The Mind of Aaron Hernandez” did a great job of highlighting his struggles including CTE.
This blog is not about defending Aaron Hernandez who committed crimes that are unimaginable. This is not a eulogy for a player that I thought was the King of Iowa. This is not a plea for football to be eradicated. This blog is about voicing and exploring the moral implications of being a lover of football and seeing grave consequences of the game. If repeated hits to the head do the damage then this is something that has to be talked about when we are educators of the youth that are receiving these hits. How do you talk to your own children about this? How do we talk to our students about this? Do we not talk about it? Is it too personal? These are the types of things that our students should be exploring for themselves in our religious studies curriculum and in their education as young adults.
A former student, now friend, is a current D1 football player who jokes about CTE that he will endure when older in order to cope with the reality that he, his teammates, and brothers might have a fate that is dark.
An acquaintance who currently plays for the Houston Texans told me, “I know all about CTE but I love football so I am willing to deal with the consequences.”
I love football. But a little piece of my heart breaks when I watch football because I know that there are consequences of the game that I can’t predict but that I know for a fact will be devastating.