Pilgrimage Reflection

Last year I applied and was selected to participate in the Mt. St. Mary’s Pilgrimage in France to learn about the Sisters of Saint Joseph and see firsthand where everything started. Honestly, I applied because I thought it was a cool way to go to France for free, learn a little more about the Sisters, and get to visit my family post-pilgrimage. It did not anticipate how transformative and magical the pilgrimage would be.  On a human level, the connection with other pilgrims on the trip was in and of itself awesome enough.  You add to that the thoughtfulness and intentionality of what we visited and how we experienced the CSJ history and you get an amazing experience.  It is honestly pretty great that the pilgrimage itself was so awesome because I ended up catching COVID (as did another 16 or the 23 in our group) which laid me out for the whole 5 days post pilgrimage — making the family piece not possible.  I did have a view of the Eiffel tower from my hotel room in Paris so I am not gonna complain, there are worse ways to experience COVID.

When I think of the various places we saw, it is difficult to pick one thing that resonated more than others.  The kitchen is the obvious pick but it is not what I am selecting.  I think for me the magic was Annecy which was the first leg of our journey. Our trip was about understanding our origins.  We tend to start with the sisters.  But for me, seeing the origins of what came before the sisters helped me understand them better.  Learning about François de Sales and Jeanne de Chantal and their unique story was the missing piece I needed.  Jeanne de Chantal’s unique entry into the church as a widow and mother and how the Daughters of the Visitation paved the way for something new inspired me.  The church is not always viewed as the most inclusive space as politics and prejudice often take center stage in the media.  I knew the Sisters were a progressive order.  I had seen this in writing before I joined Carondelet.  I have experienced it in the walls and spirit of Carondelet the school I work for.  

But understanding the origins, and seeing it firsthand, really grounded me to truly understand why this CSJ school and mission feel so right.  I see how the charism is so embedded in the DNA of the sisters that no other way forward is possible.  This realization was transformative.  As a member of what is viewed as a marginalized community, I have sometimes encountered raised eyebrows from friends when I say I work for a Catholic school.  Living the pilgrimage and seeing our origins, I see more than ever that this is where I am called to be.  I am proud to be helping carry this charism into the future.

The Good Teacher


A favorite college professor of mine, Dr. Gary Albright, used to challenge his students with the statement, “If you can’t explain it, you don’t know it.” Every claim his students made had to be explained. No statement ever went uncontested by Dr. Albright. I have used this technique throughout my teaching career. Whether it be challenging answers to math problems or statements about world peace, I have followed this same method of making students explain their answers. Explain it to me so I know you understand. This is a simple and powerful technique for increasing student understanding of what they know and don’t know. But is this comprehension test the key to being a good teacher? It is not. Although Dr. Albright was a brilliant leader of socratic seminars, he could be devastating for students who were not prepared for his assaults. If you were unprepared or just did not understand, he would dismiss you and command you to leave the class until you had an answer. Some students never returned. There is more to being a good teacher than intelligence and one successful teaching method.

For the past fifty years I have been searching for those key attributes that make a good teacher. I have not discovered a silver bullet or holy grail answer. What I have discovered is that teaching is an art. Like all art, the more the artist masters the medium, the better the artist will be. With effort and determination one can become a good artist, or a good teacher. It takes a whole other combination of qualities to become great. 

This distinction between good and great became abundantly clear to me when I had the opportunity to work with the chefs at Jeremiah Tower’s Star’s Restaurant. The executive chefs were able to create amazing original recipes every day using only the freshest ingredients they purchased each morning. I was not even in the same class as the sous chefs at Star’s. The sous chefs were amazing. The talents of the executive chefs were beyond my dreams.  

I got to know the owners and employees of Star’s Restaurant because I once owned a recreational resort where we cooked BBQ meals and provided entertainment. Star’s had its employees’ parties there for many years. I once asked executive chef Mark Franz why they kept coming back each year. He told me our food was good, our entertainment was good, and our prices were good. That perfectly fit what they wanted. It made me realize that, sometimes, being good can be great. I have always aspired to be a good teacher, even a great teacher. Every day is a new adventure and a new challenge to be a better teacher.

My lifelong quest to be a good teacher led me to read many books and articles about education. An article recently posted in Edutopia, How to Engage Students in Any Subject Area by Esther Wojcicki rang true to me. It lists and explains four attributes of effective classrooms. I am going to use Ms. Wojcicki’s four attributes as a foundation to explain in my own words what each one means to me.

  1. There’s a culture of caring and kindness within the class.

Letting your students know you care about them is essential. Without this connection, students will never feel fully vested in the class.

 I do a few simple things to let students know I care. The first is greeting each student by name. I walk around the room and make eye contact with each student. Just saying their names and making some quick remarks or asking a question makes students feel I care about each of them as individuals.

Another thing I do is an assignment called Monday Feedback. There are three questions; “What did you like?”, “What did you not like or not understand?”, and “What random question or thought do you have?. I respond to each student. This personalizes our relationship. It makes students feel more connected and gives me insights into each student. This assignment is time consuming for me, but the feedback makes the effort worthwhile.

Student teams give students the opportunity to really get to know at least some of their classmates. It takes practice to make teams work well. Done well, teams build a strong comradery among teammates. Showing teammates how to support and help each other raises the level of learning for everyone. Teams also give me an opportunity to talk with small groups in a more personalized setting.

.

  1. Students know why they’re studying the subject.

There is so much material to cover in social studies. There will never be enough time to cover all of it. Long ago I decided to focus on skills instead of content. I focus on three main skills, research, synthesizing and creating.

Research must go beyond assigned readings or DBQ’s. According to The X Files “The truth is out there.” But how does one find the truth? How does one distinguish between truth and falsehood? How does one find quality vetted sources? How does one separate the wheat from the chaff? Research must be a treasure hunt that enables students to use the most obscure clues to find the gold.

I have always been an advocate for Bloom’s Taxonomy, but Bloom’s does not include research. It does not address the acquisition of information. It just assumes the information is there. In today’s world the acquisition of information is huge. So many jobs focus on this one skill. Throw away the textbooks. Bring out the essential questions and begin the research.

The essential questions are the key to students understanding why they are learning a topic. Look at all the potential content, the current hot topics in the world, and select content that will spark students interest. Work with students to find interesting essential questions. Students love learning content that is both mind blowing and new to them. Seek out those topics. For example in past years we have asked, “How did America get itself so deeply involved in the War in Vietnam?” This year, during the research phase, I could see this topic was not fully engaging the students. We switched focus to “Was Daniel Ellsberg justified in publishing the Pentagon Papers?” They got hooked on this one and went with it.

If you cannot at least explain to students why they should be learning a topic, why the topic is important, move onto something else. There are plenty of topics that can be chosen to teach the lifelong learning skills that will enable students to learn everything they need to know for the rest of their lives.

The final phase is creating, or making it their own. Whether it is an essay, a video presentation, a discussion, or an artistic expression, students must create something to both show understanding and to make it their own. This is the step that adds to and enhances their world view. For example, how a student feels about gun control is not as important as is their understanding of the arguments pro and con. If students come to conclusions based on solid clams, with strong evidence, we have done our job.

  1. There’s a student-friendly revision policy.

Way back in the day I taught 6th grade. I returned an essay to a student replete with notes written by me with my trusty red pen. He looked at the grade and dropped the essay in the garbage can. That incident made me realize I was doing something wrong. From that point on student essays were written, corrected and graded, rewritten on unlined paper, regraded, and bound into a book of student work to be presented to parents at the end of the year. The quality of the work improved, student engagement improved, and there was no more ignoring my notes.

From that time to the present I have always allowed students to revise their work. Most student work is categorized as formative assessment. There are built in opportunities for self correcting or peer correcting before I see the assignments. I am rarely asked by a student for an opportunity to revise one of these assignments after I grade it. 

I only give two or three summative assessment projects each quarter. The students know the value of these assignments and really want to do well on them. They ask questions. They ask their classmates and me to review their written work. If the final product does not meet expectations, students generally ask for permission to revise their work. For students who need to make revisions, this is where the real learning takes place. All summative assessments are submitted to TurnItIn, so plagiarism is not a problem.

  1. Embed collaboration in most of the assignments 

Students must learn to work together and to help each other. This is always a challenge at the beginning of the year. Most students are used to working alone, sitting in rows with interpersonal contact discouraged.

There are many ways to encourage collaboration. For example, if I give a team worksheet with 10 questions, I will only grade three answers. Team members must work together or risk bad grades. Other times I randomly quiz students on the answers. No one wants to not be able to provide the correct answers. Research can be done as a team with each teammate finding three or four good sources. Peer pressure is a wonderful way to motivate students. Once the teacher gets teams working together, little oversight is needed. 

Jigsaw projects necessitate collaboration to get the pieces of the puzzle correctly placed together. Large topics are broken up into smaller topics. Each team gets a topic. Each student gets a piece of that topic. Through sharing, first with the teams and then with the whole class, everyone gets to learn from each other. The final piece of the project is designed so everyone can demonstrate what they have learned.

Students enjoy sharing their learning with their teammates. They enjoy talking to each other. Once the parameters are established the power of teaming becomes self-evident.

Students never seem to tire of telling what they have learned. I have so often been told about great ideas and interesting facts students have discovered for themselves. Sometimes these are the same materials I put in a lecture a day or two before. Being told never has the impression of discovering something on their own. Teaming gives a ready audience for discovery and multiplies the material being discovered.

These four attributes are just a place to begin, a foundation to build on. Teaching is as individual as each of us. We all have different knowledge, different skill sets, and different personalities. Whatever we bring to the classroom, students should leave with a feeling of accomplishment. If you can make students feel like they are really learning something and feel proud of themselves, you have done your job.


Take a “Data” Walk with Me

 

I have a new addition to my office …. A Data Wall!



I invite anyone to stop by and we can talk data, projects and ideas you have. Or we can have fun just going down data rabbit holes (that can be great practice in data literacy).  My goal is to keep this wall current and constantly updated with information anyone could take away and use for their classrooms. 

I am currently enjoying Shafir and Dugan’s Street Data: A Next Generation Model for Equity, Pedagogy and Social Transformation. This book shows how we could re-imagine schools by looking at data differently to understand tough concepts like equity, awareness, and coherence. The book frames big ideas in terms of  “core stances” and the one that struck a cord for me was vulnerability. One of the principals interviewed in the books says, ” …I started letting go of the pressure to be right all the time, or to have the answers. I allowed myself (and my staff) to innovate, to liberate, and we started getting somewhere. That begins with vulnerability”. The Data Wall will shine light on our strengths and areas where we need to grow. I am challenging myself to be vulnerable with you ( I definitely don’t have all the answers) and I am ready to innovate and experiment, if you are.

Another goal of mine is to blog more frequently about data trends and projects I am working on. I also want to start getting serious about Tech Tools and how we can unleash the power of data and make data work for you. 

Please stop by and let’s talk data!



Just Keep Swimming, or Can’t Stop Swimming?

Fair warning: there are a lot of parentheticals in here, because I’m basically cracking open my skull and writing it down. Apologies in advance.

I’m fully in the 3rd-year weird realm that is a combination of constant innovation to improve my teaching practices and reach students combined with the millionth-COVID-year teacher that is constantly innovating to deal with student absences/distraction/whatever, while at the same time trying to institute this fictional thing called a “work-life” balance. It’s…a mixed success. 

The constant push (internal and external) feels like that classic thing you hear about sharks: that they have to keep swimming, or they’ll die. In this case, I see science education Twitter (thanks to a great Alludo mission!) doing amazing things, and feel like I need to implement them because it’s PERFECT for my current unit and current students- which means late-night lab creation and early morning shopping. Or I see Nicole Padia find an amazing way to integrate stop-motion into her Physics class and realize it would be the *perfect* thing for my students to show their understanding of gases. Or I know that my students are going to struggle with the math part of this unit (because they do every year), so I feel like I need to rework it again to try to differentiate for different students to give a variety of access points. 

Don’t get me wrong, I love (carefully curated) EduTwitter, and my crew has made me a far better teacher than I was (shout-out to Differentiation Crew!). They have both also made me see millions of ways to that I need to (or maybe just can?) tweak or recreate things to help the students in front of me- which being the person I am, means I feel the need to make it perfect-adjacent now.

Here’s the example that Elizabeth subtly alluded to in her previous Alludo post (pun definitely intended): Our crew decided to focus on using small group instruction, so I decided to try doing a station rotation for a final unit review day for students.  The students had a variety of stations to rotate through: one for doing color-by-numbers using the unit skills, one for self-selected EdPuzzles, one for a game to practice skills, one for leveling-up practice questions (thanks again EduTwitter), and a final one to meet with me.  I grouped them into sets of 3-4 who had similar rubric scores and similar past struggles with concepts, because I figured that they would ask similar questions. When they got to my station, they were all able to receive instruction about the same level of concept at the same time, AND they were able to prepare questions based on having visited all of the other stations first! The students with the most struggle saw me last, so they had a chance to get help through EdPuzzles, try practice problems, and really hone in on where they were stuck. This was a fantastic way of combining all the differentiation concepts, EduTwitter ideas, gamification, and other amazing concepts, and I really felt like the students were able to get the help that they needed at the level and focus that it was needed; it was also a massive amount of work.  Yes, I’ll be able to use it again next year. And. This was only one class session, and there is literally no way I can put this level of preparation into every single class period and maintain any sort of sanity. 

I know that EduTwitter and EduFacebook is going to show the best things that people come up with, as with any other aspect of social media. I simultaneously wonder about what my students are missing out on if I don’t implement the different teaching strategies, which pushes me to keep swimming, always keep swimming. Frankly, I’m exhausted by the constant push (internal and external) to innovate as much as I’m excited by it, and I know I’m not the only one. While I’m trying to hold the line and generally not work at home, it’s simply not possible to not work at least one day on the weekend and some weeknights if I’m going to be able to roll out curriculum and labs that are thoughtfully designed and that account for a new bell schedule – I literally haven’t had the same bell schedule any of the years that I’ve taught here, which means that even if I were to simply reuse lecture material, it simply cannot be thrown up onto a screen, because it won’t fit the time block or end at a place that will leave the students less confused than when they walked in.

Then there are the other days, where I’m reminded by all of the same resources and people that sometimes ‘just keep swimming’ means something else entirely- a day for students to work on a project without specific programming, or maybe letting myself use something that’s worked ‘okay’ in the past without worrying about it incorporating all of the eduspeak things.  

I don’t have any interesting conclusion here – but I do think that I’m not alone in this. So how do you decide when it’s okay to ‘just keep swimming’? How do you reconcile the push to keep innovating with the need to preserve some sanity and sense of self?

—-

In an interesting twist, I found out that the ‘fact’ that sharks have to keep swimming or they will die is actually a MYTH for many sharks! How incredibly appropriate for this blog post. Even better: the reason that they don’t have this problem is that their cartilaginous structures don’t compress under pressure, so when they sink to the bottom they don’t get crushed like fish would. Instead, they can simply rest under the pressure, then wake up and rise up the water column when they are rested. If that’s not an amazing analogy for this entire thing, I don’t know what is.

In summary, my new goal is to be a shark.

Down the Russian Ukraine Rabbit Hole

 

How far back in history do you need to go in order to be able to fully understand a modern-day issue? 

This is a question that I have been wondering ever since thinking about how to bring up the situation in Ukraine to my frosh history students. How far back in history do you need to go in order to understand the root of a modern-day issue or conflict?

My students know that Russia invaded Ukraine and outside of that save for a few outlier students that is all they really know. On top of that most of them are learning about the conflict via jokes on TikTok. 

  • As I thought about how to present current events to them I wondered:
  • How much do they need to know about NATO?
  • What about the Warsaw Pact?
  • Do they need to have a working understanding of the Soviet Union?
  • What about the Cold War?
  • What do they need to know about Vladimir Putin?
  • Should we talk about Belarus? 

Thankfully I learned in my Big History planning meeting today that Joanie and Gaeby are way ahead of me and already created some awesome context slides about what is going on and saved the day and I am looking forward to sharing them with my class this week.

So while their slide show saved me from going down a long Eastern European rabbit hole the question still remains: 

  • When can I simply put on the news and show my students what is going on and when is added context critical? 
  • The classroom aside, how far down the rabbit hole do you go in a world where the news cycle turns almost completely on a daily basis?

Checking all the boxes: Manie Musicale de Mars, 2022

It’s time for March Madness in French class! Every year in March, we shake up the routine by introducing two songs a day for a few weeks. The 16 songs are organized in a March Madness style competition to be voted the favorite song of our French 1, 2 and 3 students. Check out the bracket on the wall outside of Room 28 in the academic building, and if you are interested, follow the progress of the competition. You might discover a new French-language artist that you enjoy.

I’ve been wading around in my goals doc lately, getting it ready for review, adding my links, seeking out feedback to see if it makes sense to anyone but myself. It has some gaps, some redundancies. I need to tighten it up but it is often at the bottom of my list of things to do.

As I prepare for the Manie Musicale, I see that it fits into my goals in several places. Our department goal this year is DEI. Music is a great way to bring a variety of voices to the classroom, and to engage with a multitude of perspectives. This year’s singers have all sorts of backgrounds and come from many different French-speaking places around the world. Their songs will give my students a glimpse into cultures and experiences beyond their own.

SEL is my crew, and my year-long goal is to explore ways to connect with the students who tend to remain unseen in the classroom. The shy ones, those not prone to joining a class discussion. Maybe they don’t have a friend in the room who makes them feel brave, or perhaps they are afraid of making a mistake so they don’t speak up. I hope to use the music to connect with some of these students – if there is something they particularly like, I hope it will foster a conversation. If there is something they don’t like, this can be a good jumping off point for a connection as well. I hope that the music will draw them into the class community and help them to feel seen.

And as for innovative teaching, my personal professional goal: each song contains not only the biography, culture and background of the singer, there is also the poetry of the lyrics and the message that comes through in the song. There are unlimited opportunities for class discussions, providing compelling input that leads to language acquisition.

If you are interested in any of this, join us! Here is a link to the bracket that includes links to the playlist and the music videos. Listen to the songs and fill out the bracket by Tuesday morning (March 1st). Bring it to me in Room 28 or put it in my mailbox. Vote along with us by filling out the Google surveys linked to the numbers on the bracket. Follow the progress on the bulletin board outside room 28, or on the bracket linked above. If you win, fabulous prizes await! (At least that’s what I tell my students.) Bonne manie musicale de mars! And good luck with those goals docs too.



    Alludo Journey

     

    I know that Alludo is not everyone’s cup of tea.  I also know that I personally let missions pile up too much as Alludo feedback gets bumped for other “priority” needs.  But I have to say, I always end up loving the time I do spend reading people’s reflections and missions.  I learn so much about my colleagues, about what they are doing, and really truly enjoy how thoughtful they are.  I want to run around and share some of the classroom experiments with the whole faculty but Alludo is a contained system.  

    This weekend I am sitting on an unseasonably warm, sunny patio, drinking amazing coffee and listening to a weird quantity of Emeryville birds chirping (who knew?) and reading Alludo missions.  I got sucked in this time with Kate Cutright’s station rotation experiment to get students into Colton Whitehead’s Underground Railroad and Katie Hutches’ Data-Driven student centers to help students get unstuck through meeting them where they are at.  I want to share the reflections on the blog but feel that “it is not my story to tell.”  So I am blogging… I am blogging in hopes that they and others understand that sometimes their Alludo experiments and the amazing reflections connected to them are share-worthy and that their colleagues would love to hear from their learning and try some of these great strategies in their own classes!

    Engaging Students Through Digital Tools

                  One of the biggest challenges we
    face as teachers is maintaining the attention of our students and increasing
    their involvement in the learning process.  There are always students who are highly
    motivated to learn and eagerly participate in all activities, but how do we reach
    students who seem disengaged from the learning environment?

    Of course, we strive to create a positive classroom ecology, provide
    stimulating content and cooperative learning. These techniques are useful
    strategies for engaging students. However, sometimes it can be helpful to
    integrate digital tools to improve our pedagogical practices.   I have
    found some platforms this year to help increase engagement even from students
    who are reluctant learners or are less motivated. Two of my colleagues in the
    Modern Language Department, Kristy Parsons-McClain and Sandra Cardenas
    introduced me to Blooklet and Gimkit.

    With these technology tools, you can find or create “learning sets”
    according to what you are studying. The platforms are a little bit like Kahoots
    but more sophisticated and visually pleasing. From the student’s perspective,
    it is like playing a video game where they get to practice vocabulary and
    grammar structures. The students love these games and report they that they
    feel that it helps them to practice the grammar structures and vocabulary. It
    also provides good data for the students to see how they are progressing and
    for me to see if students are acquiring the language. The other tech tools that
    I have incorporated this year are EdPuzzles, and PearDecks and I will be
    testing out GoFormative and Garbanzo this semester.

    Student Work Published on KQED Website

    Just before break, sophomore English classes participated in KQED’s Media Challenge: “Rethink School with MindShift”. The project required students to write an argumentative commentary for a two-minute video or oral presentation on the topic of how we could reimagine school.

    The most popular topics in my classes were: uniforms, school start times, homework load, and self-paced math.

    While students were encouraged to publish their videos to the KQED Youth Media Showcase, so far I’ve only had one student submit her video. And it’s fantastic. I’m so proud of Annabelle Chung for representing Carondelet on this national platform. 

    To learn more about the challenge, and other KQED Youth Media Challenges, go here.


    Science labs are back with a tech twist in biology


    When classes were remote/hybrid/physically distant, I really missed doing labs. They take a ton of time to prep, get messy in class and frequently fail to produce amazing data, but the labs are always worth it. Last year, I found some great online substitutes that may have given a deeper learning experience for the analysis side of lab work, and one of my goals this year has been to integrate that tech experience with the in-person wet lab experience. Along the way, I wanted this goal to mesh with our department goal of creating a thinking classroom where students collaborate to discover science.

    My favorite online platform is Pivot Interactives. The pandemic fueled the growth of their app and there’s been increased development by veteran science teachers who are masters in the AP and NGSS curriculum we are striving to deliver in our classrooms. The platform is great because the experiments are videoed and students can grab measuring tools on the screen to collect their own data. Students are encouraged to amend data tables that are minimally set up and prompts help them do calculations and create graphs to analyze the data. A new aspect I am attempting to master is the teacher editing feature. With this, I was able to use the app-created lab and add in the requirement that students do a different aspect of the lab in person. In several labs I was excited to see that we could do the “easy” condition in person–say room temperature for enzyme activity, and then use the online app to do 5 more temperatures and pH conditions that would have been tedious to recreate in our lab. Another great lab was with cell respiration. The students did the traditional data collection with germinating seeds, while we went to the online app to collect data in varying temperature conditions for creatures I don’t really want to experiment on in our lab–mice, crickets and rats! First semester we were able to do 9 labs like this, some with more in person work than others.

    Pivot came to the rescue with my other goal of increasing student collaboration. Although lab work usually does foster collaboration, it felt like we started the new school year with students in a more “I want to work independently and just get this work done” attitude that was necessary to get through our distant/hybrid world. Even with labs, they tried to split up the work to get it done quickly. The feature in Pivot that helped with this was the ability to assign the lab as a group activity. Previously, everyone was assigned their own “lab” online and although they were encouraged to work with their table group, many students just worked side by side without much discussion. Similar to collaborating on a google doc, the students could now manipulate variables, collect data and merge info on graphs. I was shocked how introducing the group lab feature helped the students collaborate. In real time, one group member could manipulate the videos while others were moving the measuring tools to collect information. I walked around the room listening to real conversations about what to change next and how to interpret the experiments. It seems that since they were all contributing to the same, final lab product, the team members were much more invested and engaged.

    Up next–testing an online app called Data Classroom to transform data analysis beyond spreadsheets.